mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Equitable Marketplace Mechanism Design

arXiv 2209.15418 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2022cs.GT cs.LG cs.MAcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider a trading marketplace that is populated by traders with diverse trading strategies and objectives. The marketplace allows the suppliers to list their goods and facilitates matching between buyers and sellers. In return, such a marketplace typically charges fees for facilitating trade. The goal of this work is to design a dynamic fee schedule for the marketplace that is equitable and profitable to all traders while being profitable to the marketplace at the same time (from charging fees). Since the traders adapt their strategies to the fee schedule, we present a reinforcement learning framework for simultaneously learning a marketplace fee schedule and trading strategies that adapt to this fee schedule using a weighted optimization objective of profits and equitability. We illustrate the use of the proposed approach in detail on a simulated stock exchange with different types of investors, specifically market makers and consumer investors. As we vary the equitability weights across different investor classes, we see that the learnt exchange fee schedule starts favoring the class of investors with the highest weight. We further discuss the observed insights from the simulated stock exchange in light of the general framework of equitable marketplace mechanism design.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2022.

Builds on

9 of 34 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  3. 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
  4. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  5. 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
  6. 2018A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indicescited by 97
  7. 2020The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax Policiescited by 75
  8. 2021ABIDES-Gym: Gym Environments for Multi-Agent Discrete Event Simulation and Application to Financial Marketscited by 34
  9. 2021Profit equitably: An investigation of market maker's impact on equitable outcomescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.