Securing Federated Learning against Overwhelming Collusive Attackers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the era of a data-driven society with the ubiquity of Internet of Things (IoT) devices storing large amounts of data localized at different places, distributed learning has gained a lot of traction, however, assuming independent and identically distributed data (iid) across the devices. While relaxing this assumption that anyway does not hold in reality due to the heterogeneous nature of devices, federated learning (FL) has emerged as a privacy-preserving solution to train a collaborative model over non-iid data distributed across a massive number of devices. However, the appearance of malicious devices (attackers), who intend to corrupt the FL model, is inevitable due to unrestricted participation. In this work, we aim to identify such attackers and mitigate their impact on the model, essentially under a setting of bidirectional label flipping attacks with collusion. We propose two graph theoretic algorithms, based on Minimum Spanning Tree and k-Densest graph, by leveraging correlations between local models. Our FL model can nullify the influence of attackers even when they are up to 70% of all the clients whereas prior works could not afford more than 50% of clients as attackers. The effectiveness of our algorithms is ascertained through experiments on two benchmark datasets, namely MNIST and Fashion-MNIST, with overwhelming attackers. We establish the superiority of our algorithms over the existing ones using accuracy, attack success rate, and early detection round.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2022.
Builds on
10 of 18 references.
References · 10
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 346
- 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 288
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 266
- 2021CRFL: Certifiably Robust Federated Learning against Backdoor Attackscited by 91
- 2019Federated Variance-Reduced Stochastic Gradient Descent with Robustness to Byzantine Attackscited by 79
- 2017Distributed Statistical Machine Learning in Adversarial Settings: Byzantine Gradient Descentcited by 59
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Decoding FL Defenses: Systemization, Pitfalls, and Remediescited by 0
- 2025FedStrategist: A Meta-Learning Framework for Adaptive and Robust Aggregation in Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2025Power to the Clients: Federated Learning in a Dictatorship Settingcited by 0
- 2026Adaptive Bayesian Partner Selection for Federated Clinical Centerscited by 0
- 2026Upholding Robustness in Federated Learning: Trends, Emerging Strategies, and Research Opportunitiescited by 0
- 2026Upholding Robustness in Federated Learning: Trends, Emerging Strategies, and Research Opportunities23 Sep 2026
- 2026Adaptive Bayesian Partner Selection for Federated Clinical Centers15 Sep 2026
- 2025Power to the Clients: Federated Learning in a Dictatorship Setting25 Oct 2025
- 2025FedStrategist: A Meta-Learning Framework for Adaptive and Robust Aggregation in Federated Learning18 Jul 2025
- 2025Decoding FL Defenses: Systemization, Pitfalls, and Remedies3 Feb 2025