mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Label Distribution Learning via Implicit Distribution Representation

arXiv 2209.13824 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2022cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In contrast to multi-label learning, label distribution learning characterizes the polysemy of examples by a label distribution to represent richer semantics. In the learning process of label distribution, the training data is collected mainly by manual annotation or label enhancement algorithms to generate label distribution. Unfortunately, the complexity of the manual annotation task or the inaccuracy of the label enhancement algorithm leads to noise and uncertainty in the label distribution training set. To alleviate this problem, we introduce the implicit distribution in the label distribution learning framework to characterize the uncertainty of each label value. Specifically, we use deep implicit representation learning to construct a label distribution matrix with Gaussian prior constraints, where each row component corresponds to the distribution estimate of each label value, and this row component is constrained by a prior Gaussian distribution to moderate the noise and uncertainty interference of the label distribution dataset. Finally, each row component of the label distribution matrix is transformed into a standard label distribution form by using the self-attention algorithm. In addition, some approaches with regularization characteristics are conducted in the training phase to improve the performance of the model.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2022.

Builds on

27 of 60 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  3. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  4. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,678
  5. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  6. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
  7. 2021Alias-Free Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,181
  8. 2019Scene Representation Networks: Continuous 3D-Structure-Aware Neural Scene Representationscited by 864
  9. 2019Differentiable Volumetric Rendering: Learning Implicit 3D Representations without 3D Supervisioncited by 699
  10. 2020Learning Continuous Image Representation with Local Implicit Image Functioncited by 550
  11. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  12. 2020Local Implicit Grid Representations for 3D Scenescited by 372
15 more
  1. 2022cosFormer: Rethinking Softmax in Attentioncited by 212
  2. 2020MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysiscited by 206
  3. 2020Adversarial Generation of Continuous Imagescited by 135
  4. 2014Label Distribution Learningcited by 122
  5. 2020Image Generators with Conditionally-Independent Pixel Synthesiscited by 105
  6. 2016Deep Label Distribution Learning with Label Ambiguitycited by 104
  7. 2021SubTab: Subsetting Features of Tabular Data for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 101
  8. 2020SDF-SRN: Learning Signed Distance 3D Object Reconstruction from Static Imagescited by 68
  9. 2021SimPLE: Similar Pseudo Label Exploitation for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 68
  10. 2021A Spiking Neural Network for Image Segmentationcited by 27
  11. 2022Unimodal-Concentrated Loss: Fully Adaptive Label Distribution Learning for Ordinal Regressioncited by 23
  12. 2022Towards Speaker Age Estimation with Label Distribution Learningcited by 13
  13. 2020Semantic Implicit Neural Scene Representations With Semi-Supervised Trainingcited by 9
  14. 2020Generalized Label Enhancement with Sample Correlationscited by 9
  15. 2022Towards Unbiased Label Distribution Learning for Facial Pose Estimation Using Anisotropic Spherical Gaussiancited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

6 papers.