mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Signed Latent Factors for Spamming Activity Detection

arXiv 2209.13814 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2022cs.IR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to the increasing trend of performing spamming activities (e.g., Web spam, deceptive reviews, fake followers, etc.) on various online platforms to gain undeserved benefits, spam detection has emerged as a hot research issue. Previous attempts to combat spam mainly employ features related to metadata, user behaviors, or relational ties. These studies have made considerable progress in understanding and filtering spamming campaigns. However, this problem remains far from fully solved. Almost all the proposed features focus on a limited number of observed attributes or explainable phenomena, making it difficult for existing methods to achieve further improvement. To broaden the vision about solving the spam problem and address long-standing challenges (class imbalance and graph incompleteness) in the spam detection area, we propose a new attempt of utilizing signed latent factors to filter fraudulent activities. The spam-contaminated relational datasets of multiple online applications in this scenario are interpreted by the unified signed network. Two competitive and highly dissimilar algorithms of latent factors mining (LFM) models are designed based on multi-relational likelihoods estimation (LFM-MRLE) and signed pairwise ranking (LFM-SPR), respectively. We then explore how to apply the mined latent factors to spam detection tasks. Experiments on real-world datasets of different kinds of Web applications (social media and Web forum) indicate that LFM models outperform state-of-the-art baselines in detecting spamming activities. By specifically manipulating experimental data, the effectiveness of our methods in dealing with incomplete and imbalanced challenges is validated.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2022.

Builds on

18 of 75 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
  3. 2020LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendationcited by 1,134
  4. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
  5. 2019Spam Review Detection with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 57
  6. 2015A Survey of Signed Network Mining in Social Mediacited by 25
  7. 2013SybilBelief: A Semi-supervised Learning Approach for Structure-based Sybil Detectioncited by 11
  8. 2020Fact or Factitious? Contextualized Opinion Spam Detectioncited by 6
  9. 2022Improving Fraud Detection via Hierarchical Attention-based Graph Neural Networkcited by 5
  10. 2018SINE: Scalable Incomplete Network Embeddingcited by 4
  11. 2016Detecting Singleton Review Spammers Using Semantic Similaritycited by 3
  12. 2021A Hybrid Approach for an Interpretable and Explainable Intrusion Detection Systemcited by 3
6 more
  1. 2022Modeling User Behavior With Interaction Networks for Spam Detectioncited by 2
  2. 2014What They Do in Shadows: Twitter Underground Follower Marketcited by 1
  3. 2016FLOCK: Combating Astroturfing on Livestreaming Platformscited by 1
  4. 2016Modeling Review Spam Using Temporal Patterns and Co-bursting Behaviorscited by 1
  5. 2017Is Simple Better? Revisiting Non-linear Matrix Factorization for Learning Incomplete Ratingscited by 1
  6. 2022Opinion Spam Detection: A New Approach Using Machine Learning and Network-Based Algorithmscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.