mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Safe Linear Bandits over Unknown Polytopes

arXiv 2209.13694 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The safe linear bandit problem (SLB) is an online approach to linear programming with unknown objective and unknown roundwise constraints, under stochastic bandit feedback of rewards and safety risks of actions. We study the tradeoffs between efficacy and smooth safety costs of SLBs over polytopes, and the role of aggressive doubly-optimistic play in avoiding the strong assumptions made by extant pessimistic-optimistic approaches. We first elucidate an inherent hardness in SLBs due the lack of knowledge of constraints: there exist `easy' instances, for which suboptimal extreme points have large `gaps', but on which SLB methods must still incur Omega(√T) regret or safety violations, due to an inability to resolve unknown optima to arbitrary precision. We then analyse a natural doubly-optimistic strategy for the safe linear bandit problem, DOSS, which uses optimistic estimates of both reward and safety risks to select actions, and show that despite the lack of knowledge of constraints or feasible points, DOSS simultaneously obtains tight instance-dependent O(log2 T) bounds on efficacy regret, and tilde O(√T) bounds on safety violations. Further, when safety is demanded to a finite precision, violations improve to O(log2 T). These results rely on a novel dual analysis of linear bandits: we argue that algoname proceeds by activating noisy versions of at least d constraints in each round, which allows us to separately analyse rounds where a `poor' set of constraints is activated, and rounds where `good' sets of constraints are activated. The costs in the former are controlled to O(log2 T) by developing new dual notions of gaps, based on global sensitivity analyses of linear programs, that quantify the suboptimality of each such set of constraints. The latter costs are controlled to O(1) by explicitly analysing the solutions of optimistic play.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2022.

Builds on

20 of 31 references.

References · 20

  1. 2013Bandits with Knapsackscited by 163
  2. 2020Exploration-Exploitation in Constrained MDPscited by 146
  3. 2020Safe Reinforcement Learning in Constrained Markov Decision Processescited by 109
  4. 2019Linear Stochastic Bandits Under Safety Constraintscited by 90
  5. 2014Bandits with concave rewards and convex knapsackscited by 83
  6. 2015Linear Contextual Bandits with Knapsackscited by 82
  7. 2016Safe Exploration in Finite Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processescited by 72
  8. 2020Stochastic Bandits with Linear Constraintscited by 68
  9. 2016Conservative Banditscited by 58
  10. 2014Resourceful Contextual Banditscited by 45
  11. 2015An efficient algorithm for contextual bandits with knapsacks, and an extension to concave objectivescited by 43
  12. 2019Safe Linear Thompson Sampling with Side Informationcited by 37
8 more
  1. 2022Near-Optimal Sample Complexity Bounds for Constrained MDPscited by 36
  2. 2018Almost Optimal Algorithms for Linear Stochastic Bandits with Heavy-Tailed Payoffscited by 31
  3. 2021An Efficient Pessimistic-Optimistic Algorithm for Stochastic Linear Bandits with General Constraintscited by 29
  4. 2021Best Arm Identification with Safety Constraintscited by 25
  5. 2022Active Learning with Safety Constraintscited by 16
  6. 2022Strategies for Safe Multi-Armed Bandits with Logarithmic Regret and Riskcited by 14
  7. 2022Norm-Agnostic Linear Banditscited by 12
  8. 2014On the Complexity of Bandit Linear Optimizationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 6; 2026: 5.

13 papers.

Sort: