Reconstruction-guided attention improves the robustness and shape processing of neural networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many visual phenomena suggest that humans use top-down generative or reconstructive processes to create visual percepts (e.g., imagery, object completion, pareidolia), but little is known about the role reconstruction plays in robust object recognition. We built an iterative encoder-decoder network that generates an object reconstruction and used it as top-down attentional feedback to route the most relevant spatial and feature information to feed-forward object recognition processes. We tested this model using the challenging out-of-distribution digit recognition dataset, MNIST-C, where 15 different types of transformation and corruption are applied to handwritten digit images. Our model showed strong generalization performance against various image perturbations, on average outperforming all other models including feedforward CNNs and adversarially trained networks. Our model is particularly robust to blur, noise, and occlusion corruptions, where shape perception plays an important role. Ablation studies further reveal two complementary roles of spatial and feature-based attention in robust object recognition, with the former largely consistent with spatial masking benefits in the attention literature (the reconstruction serves as a mask) and the latter mainly contributing to the model's inference speed (i.e., number of time steps to reach a certain confidence threshold) by reducing the space of possible object hypotheses. We also observed that the model sometimes hallucinates a non-existing pattern out of noise, leading to highly interpretable human-like errors. Our study shows that modeling reconstruction-based feedback endows AI systems with a powerful attention mechanism, which can help us understand the role of generating perception in human visual processing.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2022.
Builds on
19 of 54 references.
References · 19
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2018ESRGAN: Enhanced Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,250
- 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 865
- 2017Dynamic Routing Between Capsulescited by 689
- 2015Semi-Supervised Learning with Ladder Networkscited by 246
- 2020On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 230
- 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
7 more
- 2019MNIST-C: A Robustness Benchmark for Computer Visioncited by 137
- 2017A Study and Comparison of Human and Deep Learning Recognition Performance Under Visual Distortionscited by 107
- 2018Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNISTcited by 104
- 2021Generalization and Robustness Implications in Object-Centric Learningcited by 81
- 2020Capsules with Inverted Dot-Product Attention Routingcited by 25
- 2019Capsule Networks with Max-Min Normalizationcited by 6
- 2021Recurrent Attention Models with Object-centric Capsule Representation for Multi-object Recognitioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.