A connection between probability, physics and neural networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We illustrate an approach that can be exploited for constructing neural networks which a priori obey physical laws. We start with a simple single-layer neural network (NN) but refrain from choosing the activation functions yet. Under certain conditions and in the infinite-width limit, we may apply the central limit theorem, upon which the NN output becomes Gaussian. We may then investigate and manipulate the limit network by falling back on Gaussian process (GP) theory. It is observed that linear operators acting upon a GP again yield a GP. This also holds true for differential operators defining differential equations and describing physical laws. If we demand the GP, or equivalently the limit network, to obey the physical law, then this yields an equation for the covariance function or kernel of the GP, whose solution equivalently constrains the model to obey the physical law. The central limit theorem then suggests that NNs can be constructed to obey a physical law by choosing the activation functions such that they match a particular kernel in the infinite-width limit. The activation functions constructed in this way guarantee the NN to a priori obey the physics, up to the approximation error of non-infinite network width. Simple examples of the homogeneous 1D-Helmholtz equation are discussed and compared to naive kernels and activations.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2022.
Builds on
21 of 43 references.
References · 21
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 617
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
- 2018Bayesian Deep Convolutional Networks with Many Channels are Gaussian Processescited by 164
- 2017Machine Learning of Linear Differential Equations using Gaussian Processescited by 139
- 2020Infinite attention: NNGP and NTK for deep attention networkscited by 117
- 2020A survey on modern trainable activation functionscited by 89
- 2020A Survey of Constrained Gaussian Process Regression: Approaches and Implementation Challengescited by 51
- 2017Linearly constrained Gaussian processescited by 41
- 2019Physical Symmetries Embedded in Neural Networkscited by 40
9 more
- 2015Steps Toward Deep Kernel Methods from Infinite Neural Networkscited by 28
- 2021Data vs. Physics: The Apparent Pareto Front of Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 26
- 2019Expressive Priors in Bayesian Neural Networks: Kernel Combinations and Periodic Functionscited by 22
- 2015Polynomial-Chaos-based Krigingcited by 21
- 2020Gaussian Process Regression constrained by Boundary Value Problemscited by 15
- 2017Invariance of Weight Distributions in Rectified MLPscited by 12
- 2021Bayesian Surrogate Analysis and Uncertainty Propagationcited by 10
- 2018Physically-Inspired Gaussian Process Models for Post-Transcriptional Regulation in Drosophilacited by 3
- 2022Stochastic Modeling of Inhomogeneities in the Aortic Wall and Uncertainty Quantification using a Bayesian Encoder-Decoder Surrogatecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
2 papers.