Clustering by Direct Optimization of the Medoid Silhouette
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The evaluation of clustering results is difficult, highly dependent on the evaluated data set and the perspective of the beholder. There are many different clustering quality measures, which try to provide a general measure to validate clustering results. A very popular measure is the Silhouette. We discuss the efficient medoid-based variant of the Silhouette, perform a theoretical analysis of its properties, and provide two fast versions for the direct optimization. We combine ideas from the original Silhouette with the well-known PAM algorithm and its latest improvements FasterPAM. One of the versions guarantees equal results to the original variant and provides a run speedup of O(k2). In experiments on real data with 30000 samples and k=100, we observed a 10464× speedup compared to the original PAMMEDSIL algorithm.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2022.
Builds on
2 of 20 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Stop using the elbow criterion for k-means and how to choose the number of clusters insteadcited by 25
- 2023CARL-G: Clustering-Accelerated Representation Learning on Graphscited by 6
- 2025An upper bound on the silhouette evaluation metric for clusteringcited by 0
- 2026Robust K-means Clustering using the Density Power Divergence Measurecited by 0
- 2026Robust K-means Clustering using the Density Power Divergence Measure30 Aug 2026
- 2025An upper bound on the silhouette evaluation metric for clustering10 Sep 2025
- 2023CARL-G: Clustering-Accelerated Representation Learning on Graphs12 Jun 2023
- 2022Stop using the elbow criterion for k-means and how to choose the number of clusters instead23 Dec 2022