Dordis: Efficient Federated Learning with Dropout-Resilient Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) is increasingly deployed among multiple clients to train a shared model over decentralized data. To address privacy concerns, FL systems need to safeguard the clients' data from disclosure during training and control data leakage through trained models when exposed to untrusted domains. Distributed differential privacy (DP) offers an appealing solution in this regard as it achieves a balanced tradeoff between privacy and utility without a trusted server. However, existing distributed DP mechanisms are impractical in the presence of client dropout, resulting in poor privacy guarantees or degraded training accuracy. In addition, these mechanisms suffer from severe efficiency issues. We present Dordis, a distributed differentially private FL framework that is highly efficient and resilient to client dropout. Specifically, we develop a novel `add-then-remove' scheme that enforces a required noise level precisely in each training round, even if some sampled clients drop out. This ensures that the privacy budget is utilized prudently, despite unpredictable client dynamics. To boost performance, Dordis operates as a distributed parallel architecture via encapsulating the communication and computation operations into stages. It automatically divides the global model aggregation into several chunk-aggregation tasks and pipelines them for optimal speedup. Large-scale deployment evaluations demonstrate that Dordis efficiently handles client dropout in various realistic FL scenarios, achieving the optimal privacy-utility tradeoff and accelerating training by up to 2.4× compared to existing solutions.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2025MobileA3gent: Training Mobile GUI Agents Using Decentralized Self-Sourced Data from Diverse Userscited by 10
- 2025FedMABench: Benchmarking Mobile Agents on Decentralized Heterogeneous User Datacited by 3
- 2025AdRo-FL: Informed and Secure Client Selection for Federated Learning in the Presence of Adversarial Aggregatorcited by 1
- 2025On the Inference (In-)Security of Vertical Federated Learning: Efficient Auditing against Inference Tampering Attackcited by 0
- 2025From Privacy to Trust in the Agentic Era: A Taxonomy of Challenges in Trustworthy Federated Learning Through the Lens of Trust Report 2.0cited by 0
- 2026FedGUI: Benchmarking Federated GUI Agents across Heterogeneous Platforms, Devices, and Operating Systemscited by 0
- 2026FedGUI: Benchmarking Federated GUI Agents across Heterogeneous Platforms, Devices, and Operating Systems16 Apr 2026
- 2025From Privacy to Trust in the Agentic Era: A Taxonomy of Challenges in Trustworthy Federated Learning Through the Lens of Trust Report 2.021 Jul 2025
- 2025On the Inference (In-)Security of Vertical Federated Learning: Efficient Auditing against Inference Tampering Attack3 Jul 2025
- 2025AdRo-FL: Informed and Secure Client Selection for Federated Learning in the Presence of Adversarial Aggregator21 Jun 2025
- 2025FedMABench: Benchmarking Mobile Agents on Decentralized Heterogeneous User Data7 Mar 2025
- 2025MobileA3gent: Training Mobile GUI Agents Using Decentralized Self-Sourced Data from Diverse Users5 Feb 2025