Entailment Semantics Can Be Extracted from an Ideal Language Model
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models are often trained on text alone, without additional grounding. There is debate as to how much of natural language semantics can be inferred from such a procedure. We prove that entailment judgments between sentences can be extracted from an ideal language model that has perfectly learned its target distribution, assuming the training sentences are generated by Gricean agents, i.e., agents who follow fundamental principles of communication from the linguistic theory of pragmatics. We also show entailment judgments can be decoded from the predictions of a language model trained on such Gricean data. Our results reveal a pathway for understanding the semantic information encoded in unlabeled linguistic data and a potential framework for extracting semantics from language models.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2022.
Builds on
6 of 29 references.
References · 6
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
- 2021Provable Limitations of Acquiring Meaning from Ungrounded Form: What Will Future Language Models Understand?cited by 55
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 6; 2024: 3.
10 papers.
- 2023A Latent Space Theory for Emergent Abilities in Large Language Modelscited by 43
- 2022DALL-E 2 Fails to Reliably Capture Common Syntactic Processescited by 31
- 2023Dissociating language and thought in large language modelscited by 29
- 2023Do Language Models' Words Refer?cited by 17
- 2023Are Language Models Worse than Humans at Following Prompts? It's Complicatedcited by 14
- 2024Can You Learn Semantics Through Next-Word Prediction? The Case of Entailmentcited by 9
- 2024A Novel Cartography-Based Curriculum Learning Method Applied on RoNLI: The First Romanian Natural Language Inference Corpuscited by 8
- 2023Simple Linguistic Inferences of Large Language Models (LLMs): Blind Spots and Blindscited by 7
- 2024Strong hallucinations from negation and how to fix themcited by 6
- 2023For Generated Text, Is NLI-Neutral Text the Best Text?cited by 1
- 2024A Novel Cartography-Based Curriculum Learning Method Applied on RoNLI: The First Romanian Natural Language Inference Corpus20 May 2024
- 2024Can You Learn Semantics Through Next-Word Prediction? The Case of Entailment21 Feb 2024
- 2024Strong hallucinations from negation and how to fix them16 Feb 2024
- 2023Do Language Models' Words Refer?10 Aug 2023
- 2023Simple Linguistic Inferences of Large Language Models (LLMs): Blind Spots and Blinds24 May 2023
- 2023A Latent Space Theory for Emergent Abilities in Large Language Models19 Apr 2023
- 2023For Generated Text, Is NLI-Neutral Text the Best Text?16 Feb 2023
- 2023Are Language Models Worse than Humans at Following Prompts? It's Complicated17 Jan 2023
- 2023Dissociating language and thought in large language models16 Jan 2023
- 2022DALL-E 2 Fails to Reliably Capture Common Syntactic Processes23 Oct 2022