mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Entailment Semantics Can Be Extracted from an Ideal Language Model

arXiv 2209.12407 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2022cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language models are often trained on text alone, without additional grounding. There is debate as to how much of natural language semantics can be inferred from such a procedure. We prove that entailment judgments between sentences can be extracted from an ideal language model that has perfectly learned its target distribution, assuming the training sentences are generated by Gricean agents, i.e., agents who follow fundamental principles of communication from the linguistic theory of pragmatics. We also show entailment judgments can be decoded from the predictions of a language model trained on such Gricean data. Our results reveal a pathway for understanding the semantic information encoded in unlabeled linguistic data and a potential framework for extracting semantics from language models.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2022.

Builds on

6 of 29 references.

References · 6

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  4. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  5. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
  6. 2021Provable Limitations of Acquiring Meaning from Ungrounded Form: What Will Future Language Models Understand?cited by 55

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 6; 2024: 3.

10 papers.