mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Deep Investigation of RNN and Self-attention for the Cyrillic-Traditional Mongolian Bidirectional Conversion

arXiv 2209.11963 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cyrillic and Traditional Mongolian are the two main members of the Mongolian writing system. The Cyrillic-Traditional Mongolian Bidirectional Conversion (CTMBC) task includes two conversion processes, including Cyrillic Mongolian to Traditional Mongolian (C2T) and Traditional Mongolian to Cyrillic Mongolian conversions (T2C). Previous researchers adopted the traditional joint sequence model, since the CTMBC task is a natural Sequence-to-Sequence (Seq2Seq) modeling problem. Recent studies have shown that Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Self-attention (or Transformer) based encoder-decoder models have shown significant improvement in machine translation tasks between some major languages, such as Mandarin, English, French, etc. However, an open problem remains as to whether the CTMBC quality can be improved by utilizing the RNN and Transformer models. To answer this question, this paper investigates the utility of these two powerful techniques for CTMBC task combined with agglutinative characteristics of Mongolian language. We build the encoder-decoder based CTMBC model based on RNN and Transformer respectively and compare the different network configurations deeply. The experimental results show that both RNN and Transformer models outperform the traditional joint sequence model, where the Transformer achieves the best performance. Compared with the joint sequence baseline, the word error rate (WER) of the Transformer for C2T and T2C decreased by 5.72% and 5.06% respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2022.

Builds on

14 of 30 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  4. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  5. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  6. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  7. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
  8. 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,303
  9. 2017Tacotron: Towards End-to-End Speech Synthesiscited by 487
  10. 2018Tensor2Tensor for Neural Machine Translationcited by 85
  11. 2018Training Tips for the Transformer Modelcited by 85
  12. 2015Sequence-to-Sequence Neural Net Models for Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversioncited by 19
2 more
  1. 2019Teacher-Student Training for Robust Tacotron-based TTScited by 11
  2. 2020Modeling Prosodic Phrasing with Multi-Task Learning in Tacotron-based TTScited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.