The complexity of unsupervised learning of lexicographic preferences
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper considers the task of learning users' preferences on a combinatorial set of alternatives, as generally used by online configurators, for example. In many settings, only a set of selected alternatives during past interactions is available to the learner. Fargier et al. [2018] propose an approach to learn, in such a setting, a model of the users' preferences that ranks previously chosen alternatives as high as possible; and an algorithm to learn, in this setting, a particular model of preferences: lexicographic preferences trees (LP-trees). In this paper, we study complexity-theoretical problems related to this approach. We give an upper bound on the sample complexity of learning an LP-tree, which is logarithmic in the number of attributes. We also prove that computing the LP tree that minimises the empirical risk can be done in polynomial time when restricted to the class of linear LP-trees.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2022.
Builds on
1 of 32 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.