mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Boosting as Frank-Wolfe

arXiv 2209.10831 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2022cs.LG math.OCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Some boosting algorithms, such as LPBoost, ERLPBoost, and C-ERLPBoost, aim to solve the soft margin optimization problem with the ℓ1-norm regularization. LPBoost rapidly converges to an ε-approximate solution in practice, but it is known to take Omega(m) iterations in the worst case, where m is the sample size. On the other hand, ERLPBoost and C-ERLPBoost are guaranteed to converge to an ε-approximate solution in O(frac1ε2 ln fracmnu) iterations. However, the computation per iteration is very high compared to LPBoost. To address this issue, we propose a generic boosting scheme that combines the Frank-Wolfe algorithm and any secondary algorithm and switches one to the other iteratively. We show that the scheme retains the same convergence guarantee as ERLPBoost and C-ERLPBoost. One can incorporate any secondary algorithm to improve in practice. This scheme comes from a unified view of boosting algorithms for soft margin optimization. More specifically, we show that LPBoost, ERLPBoost, and C-ERLPBoost are instances of the Frank-Wolfe algorithm. In experiments on real datasets, one of the instances of our scheme exploits the better updates of the secondary algorithm and performs comparably with LPBoost.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2022.

Builds on

3 of 17 references.

References · 3

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2015On the Global Linear Convergence of Frank-Wolfe Optimization Variantscited by 77
  3. 2015Functional Frank-Wolfe Boosting for General Loss Functionscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.