On the Complexity of Finding Small Subgradients in Nonsmooth Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the oracle complexity of producing (δ,ε)-stationary points of Lipschitz functions, in the sense proposed by Zhang et al. [2020]. While there exist dimension-free randomized algorithms for producing such points within widetildeO(1/δε3) first-order oracle calls, we show that no dimension-free rate can be achieved by a deterministic algorithm. On the other hand, we point out that this rate can be derandomized for smooth functions with merely a logarithmic dependence on the smoothness parameter. Moreover, we establish several lower bounds for this task which hold for any randomized algorithm, with or without convexity. Finally, we show how the convergence rate of finding (δ,ε)-stationary points can be improved in case the function is convex, a setting which we motivate by proving that in general no finite time algorithm can produce points with small subgradients even for convex functions.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2022.
Builds on
11 of 20 references.
References · 11
- 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 569
- 2017Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points Icited by 125
- 2017Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points II: First-Order Methodscited by 55
- 2018How To Make the Gradients Small Stochastically: Even Faster Convex and Nonconvex SGDcited by 55
- 2022Gradient-Free Methods for Deterministic and Stochastic Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 40
- 2021Oracle Complexity in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 38
- 2021A gradient sampling method with complexity guarantees for Lipschitz functions in high and low dimensionscited by 37
- 2020Acceleration with a Ball Optimization Oraclecited by 31
- 2021On the Finite-Time Complexity and Practical Computation of Approximate Stationarity Concepts of Lipschitz Functionscited by 30
- 2017Lower Bound for Randomized First Order Convex Optimizationcited by 9
- 2018Complexity of finding near-stationary points of convex functions stochasticallycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Optimal Stochastic Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization through Online-to-Non-convex Conversioncited by 42
- 2024Random Scaling and Momentum for Non-smooth Non-convex Optimizationcited by 18
- 2023Faster Gradient-Free Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 16
- 2025Online Convex Optimization with Heavy Tails: Old Algorithms, New Regrets, and Applicationscited by 13
- 2023Oracle Complexity of Single-Loop Switching Subgradient Methods for Non-Smooth Weakly Convex Functional Constrained Optimizationcited by 11
- 2023Testing Stationarity Concepts for ReLU Networks: Hardness, Regularity, and Robust Algorithmscited by 2
- 2026Adam Converges in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Adam Converges in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization21 Jun 2026
- 2025Online Convex Optimization with Heavy Tails: Old Algorithms, New Regrets, and Applications10 Aug 2025
- 2024Random Scaling and Momentum for Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization16 May 2024
- 2023Testing Stationarity Concepts for ReLU Networks: Hardness, Regularity, and Robust Algorithms23 Feb 2023
- 2023Optimal Stochastic Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization through Online-to-Non-convex Conversion7 Feb 2023
- 2023Oracle Complexity of Single-Loop Switching Subgradient Methods for Non-Smooth Weakly Convex Functional Constrained Optimization30 Jan 2023
- 2023Faster Gradient-Free Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization16 Jan 2023