mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparing Shape-Constrained Regression Algorithms for Data Validation

arXiv 2209.09602 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2022cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Industrial and scientific applications handle large volumes of data that render manual validation by humans infeasible. Therefore, we require automated data validation approaches that are able to consider the prior knowledge of domain experts to produce dependable, trustworthy assessments of data quality. Prior knowledge is often available as rules that describe interactions of inputs with regard to the target e.g. the target must be monotonically decreasing and convex over increasing input values. Domain experts are able to validate multiple such interactions at a glance. However, existing rule-based data validation approaches are unable to consider these constraints. In this work, we compare different shape-constrained regression algorithms for the purpose of data validation based on their classification accuracy and runtime performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2022.

Builds on

4 of 10 references.

References · 4

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2021Shape-constrained Symbolic Regression -- Improving Extrapolation with Prior Knowledgecited by 27
  3. 2019A Survey of Data Quality Measurement and Monitoring Toolscited by 19
  4. 2018Optimization over Nonnegative and Convex Polynomials With and Without Semidefinite Programmingcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.