Machine Learning Class Numbers of Real Quadratic Fields
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We implement and interpret various supervised learning experiments involving real quadratic fields with class numbers 1, 2 and 3. We quantify the relative difficulties in separating class numbers of matching/different parity from a data-scientific perspective, apply the methodology of feature analysis and principal component analysis, and use symbolic classification to develop machine-learned formulas for class numbers 1, 2 and 3 that apply to our dataset.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2022.
Builds on
3 of 13 references.
References · 3
- 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
- 2020Machine-Learning the Sato--Tate Conjecturecited by 14
- 2022Murmurations of elliptic curvescited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPTcited by 263
- 2025Machines Learn Number Fields, But How? The Case of Galois Groupscited by 2
- 2025From Black Box to Bijection: Interpreting Machine Learning to Build a Zeta Map Algorithmcited by 2
- 2024Machine Learning Mutation-Acyclicity of Quiverscited by 1
- 2026Murmurations: a case study in AI-assisted mathematicscited by 0
- 2026Decision trees, Frobenius traces, and Weierstrass coefficients of elliptic curvescited by 0
- 2026Decision trees, Frobenius traces, and Weierstrass coefficients of elliptic curves27 Jul 2026
- 2026Murmurations: a case study in AI-assisted mathematics10 Mar 2026
- 2025From Black Box to Bijection: Interpreting Machine Learning to Build a Zeta Map Algorithm16 Nov 2025
- 2025Machines Learn Number Fields, But How? The Case of Galois Groups8 Aug 2025
- 2024Machine Learning Mutation-Acyclicity of Quivers6 Nov 2024
- 2023Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPT31 Jan 2023