mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Compositional Law Parsing with Latent Random Functions

arXiv 2209.09115 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human cognition has compositionality. We understand a scene by decomposing the scene into different concepts (e.g., shape and position of an object) and learning the respective laws of these concepts, which may be either natural (e.g., laws of motion) or man-made (e.g., laws of a game). The automatic parsing of these laws indicates the model's ability to understand the scene, which makes law parsing play a central role in many visual tasks. This paper proposes a deep latent variable model for Compositional LAw Parsing (CLAP), which achieves the human-like compositionality ability through an encoding-decoding architecture to represent concepts in the scene as latent variables. CLAP employs concept-specific latent random functions instantiated with Neural Processes to capture the law of concepts. Our experimental results demonstrate that CLAP outperforms the baseline methods in multiple visual tasks such as intuitive physics, abstract visual reasoning, and scene representation. The law manipulation experiments illustrate CLAP's interpretability by modifying specific latent random functions on samples. For example, CLAP learns the laws of position-changing and appearance constancy from the moving balls in a scene, making it possible to exchange laws between samples or compose existing laws into novel laws.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2022.

Builds on

42 of 58 references.

References · 42

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 865
  4. 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 614
  5. 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 440
  6. 2018Conditional Neural Processescited by 421
  7. 2019Multi-Object Representation Learning with Iterative Variational Inferencecited by 359
  8. 2018Neural Processescited by 307
  9. 2019Attentive Neural Processescited by 280
  10. 2020Scalable Gradients for Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 264
  11. 2016Attend, Infer, Repeat: Fast Scene Understanding with Generative Modelscited by 209
  12. 2020SPACE: Unsupervised Object-Oriented Scene Representation via Spatial Attention and Decompositioncited by 190
30 more
  1. 2019GP-VAE: Deep Probabilistic Time Series Imputationcited by 171
  2. 2018Isolating Sources of Disentanglement in Variational Autoencoderscited by 167
  3. 2018Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networkscited by 165
  4. 2016Learning to Poke by Poking: Experiential Learning of Intuitive Physicscited by 152
  5. 2018Sequential Attend, Infer, Repeat: Generative Modelling of Moving Objectscited by 128
  6. 2017Neural Expectation Maximizationcited by 123
  7. 2018Meta-Learning Probabilistic Inference For Predictioncited by 108
  8. 2019SCALOR: Generative World Models with Scalable Object Representationscited by 108
  9. 2019On the Transfer of Inductive Bias from Simulation to the Real World: a New Disentanglement Datasetcited by 100
  10. 2020Meta-Learning Stationary Stochastic Process Prediction with Convolutional Neural Processescited by 74
  11. 2020Improving Generative Imagination in Object-Centric World Modelscited by 70
  12. 2020Generative Neurosymbolic Machinescited by 57
  13. 2021Neural ODE Processescited by 57
  14. 2019Sequential Neural Processescited by 55
  15. 2020The Scattering Compositional Learner: Discovering Objects, Attributes, Relationships in Analogical Reasoningcited by 46
  16. 2019The Functional Neural Processcited by 43
  17. 2018Relational inductive bias for physical construction in humans and machinescited by 41
  18. 2020Bootstrapping Neural Processescited by 40
  19. 2021Efficient Iterative Amortized Inference for Learning Symmetric and Disentangled Multi-Object Representationscited by 36
  20. 2018Improving Generalization for Abstract Reasoning Tasks Using Disentangled Feature Representationscited by 28
  21. 2022Compositional Scene Representation Learning via Reconstruction: A Surveycited by 27
  22. 2020Identifying Latent Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 21
  23. 2019Explicit Disentanglement of Appearance and Perspective in Generative Modelscited by 20
  24. 2018Interpretable Intuitive Physics Modelcited by 19
  25. 2019Adaptive Deep Kernel Learningcited by 15
  26. 2021Unsupervised Learning of Compositional Scene Representations from Multiple Unspecified Viewpointscited by 11
  27. 2021Raven's Progressive Matrices Completion with Latent Gaussian Process Priorscited by 9
  28. 2019Spatial Mixture Models with Learnable Deep Priors for Perceptual Groupingcited by 8
  29. 2018Meta-learning autoencoders for few-shot predictioncited by 7
  30. 2021Knowledge-Guided Object Discovery with Acquired Deep Impressionscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022A Benchmark for Compositional Visual Reasoning
  2. 2025COGITAO: A Visual Reasoning Framework To Study Compositionality & Generalization
  3. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?
  4. 2023Linear Spaces of Meanings: Compositional Structures in Vision-Language Models
  5. 2023Exploring Compositional Visual Generation with Latent Classifier Guidance
  6. 2026Diagnosing the Sources of Compositional Failure in Vision-Language Models: A Controlled Analysis
  7. 2023Im-Promptu: In-Context Composition from Image Prompts
  8. 2026CARV: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Compositional Analogical Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs