mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A model-agnostic approach for generating Saliency Maps to explain inferred decisions of Deep Learning Models

arXiv 2209.08906 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread use of black-box AI models has raised the need for algorithms and methods that explain the decisions made by these models. In recent years, the AI research community is increasingly interested in models' explainability since black-box models take over more and more complicated and challenging tasks. Explainability becomes critical considering the dominance of deep learning techniques for a wide range of applications, including but not limited to computer vision. In the direction of understanding the inference process of deep learning models, many methods that provide human comprehensible evidence for the decisions of AI models have been developed, with the vast majority relying their operation on having access to the internal architecture and parameters of these models (e.g., the weights of neural networks). We propose a model-agnostic method for generating saliency maps that has access only to the output of the model and does not require additional information such as gradients. We use Differential Evolution (DE) to identify which image pixels are the most influential in a model's decision-making process and produce class activation maps (CAMs) whose quality is comparable to the quality of CAMs created with model-specific algorithms. DE-CAM achieves good performance without requiring access to the internal details of the model's architecture at the cost of more computational complexity.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2022.

Builds on

14 of 30 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  6. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  7. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  8. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  9. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  10. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  11. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
  12. 2019Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualizationcited by 189
2 more
  1. 2021Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Modelscited by 136
  2. 2019Improving performance of deep learning models with axiomatic attribution priors and expected gradientscited by 32

Built on by

Not cited yet.