mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Geometry of Self-supervised Learning Models and its Impact on Transfer Learning

arXiv 2209.08622 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2022cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-supervised learning (SSL) has emerged as a desirable paradigm in computer vision due to the inability of supervised models to learn representations that can generalize in domains with limited labels. The recent popularity of SSL has led to the development of several models that make use of diverse training strategies, architectures, and data augmentation policies with no existing unified framework to study or assess their effectiveness in transfer learning. We propose a data-driven geometric strategy to analyze different SSL models using local neighborhoods in the feature space induced by each. Unlike existing approaches that consider mathematical approximations of the parameters, individual components, or optimization landscape, our work aims to explore the geometric properties of the representation manifolds learned by SSL models. Our proposed manifold graph metrics (MGMs) provide insights into the geometric similarities and differences between available SSL models, their invariances with respect to specific augmentations, and their performances on transfer learning tasks. Our key findings are two fold: (i) contrary to popular belief, the geometry of SSL models is not tied to its training paradigm (contrastive, non-contrastive, and cluster-based); (ii) we can predict the transfer learning capability for a specific model based on the geometric properties of its semantic and augmentation manifolds.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2022.

Builds on

47 of 70 references.

References · 47

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  5. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  6. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  7. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  8. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  9. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
  10. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  11. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  12. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
35 more
  1. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  2. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  3. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,591
  4. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  5. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
  6. 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,069
  7. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  8. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,028
  9. 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 972
  10. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
  11. 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 808
  12. 2019Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 669
  13. 2020Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representationscited by 640
  14. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
  15. 2019Self-labelling via simultaneous clustering and representation learningcited by 528
  16. 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 398
  17. 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378
  18. 2021With a Little Help from My Friends: Nearest-Neighbor Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 326
  19. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 313
  20. 2021Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairscited by 256
  21. 2020What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learningcited by 226
  22. 2016Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detectioncited by 219
  23. 2020How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer?cited by 213
  24. 2018Deep k-Nearest Neighbors: Towards Confident, Interpretable and Robust Deep Learningcited by 207
  25. 2021Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?cited by 187
  26. 2021On Feature Decorrelation in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 160
  27. 2021Towards the Generalization of Contrastive Self-Supervised Learningcited by 99
  28. 2020BYOL works even without batch statisticscited by 95
  29. 2013Robust subspace clusteringcited by 24
  30. 2019Deep geometric knowledge distillation with graphscited by 21
  31. 2022Toward a Geometrical Understanding of Self-supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 17
  32. 2014Active Semi-Supervised Learning Using Sampling Theory for Graph Signalscited by 8
  33. 2019Introducing Graph Smoothness Loss for Training Deep Learning Architecturescited by 6
  34. 2020Deep Autoencoders: From Understanding to Generalization Guaranteescited by 5
  35. 2021Channel redundancy and overlap in convolutional neural networks with channel-wise NNK graphscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

7 papers.