Improved Generalization Bound and Learning of Sparsity Patterns for Data-Driven Low-Rank Approximation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning sketching matrices for fast and accurate low-rank approximation (LRA) has gained increasing attention. Recently, Bartlett, Indyk, and Wagner (COLT 2022) presented a generalization bound for the learning-based LRA. Specifically, for rank-k approximation using an m × n learned sketching matrix with s non-zeros in each column, they proved an tildeO(nsm) bound on the fat shattering dimension (tildeO hides logarithmic factors). We build on their work and make two contributions. 1. We present a better tildeO(nsk) bound (k ≤ m). En route to obtaining this result, we give a low-complexity Goldberg--Jerrum algorithm for computing pseudo-inverse matrices, which would be of independent interest. 2. We alleviate an assumption of the previous study that sketching matrices have a fixed sparsity pattern. We prove that learning positions of non-zeros increases the fat shattering dimension only by O(nslog n). In addition, experiments confirm the practical benefit of learning sparsity patterns.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2022.
Builds on
16 of 31 references.
References · 16
- 2014Sketching as a Tool for Numerical Linear Algebracited by 285
- 2017Non-convex Optimization for Machine Learningcited by 132
- 2018Learning to Branchcited by 78
- 2013Revisiting the Nystrom Method for Improved Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 76
- 2015A PAC Approach to Application-Specific Algorithm Selectioncited by 57
- 2019Learning-Based Low-Rank Approximationscited by 41
- 2021Sample Complexity of Tree Search Configuration: Cutting Planes and Beyondcited by 33
- 2019How much data is sufficient to learn high-performing algorithms? Generalization guarantees for data-driven algorithm designcited by 27
- 2022Generalization Bounds for Data-Driven Numerical Linear Algebracited by 24
- 2020Learning the Positions in CountSketchcited by 20
- 2019Learning to Linkcited by 13
- 2021Improved Sample Complexity Bounds for Branch-and-Cutcited by 13
4 more
- 2020Refined bounds for algorithm configuration: The knife-edge of dual class approximabilitycited by 12
- 2020Sparse Linear Networks with a Fixed Butterfly Structure: Theory and Practicecited by 9
- 2022Sample Complexity of Learning Heuristic Functions for Greedy-Best-First and A* Searchcited by 6
- 2017An Approach to One-Bit Compressed Sensing Based on Probably Approximately Correct Learning Theorycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Generalization Bound and Learning Methods for Data-Driven Projections in Linear Programmingcited by 10
- 2024Algorithm Configuration for Structured Pfaffian Settingscited by 10
- 2025Provably data-driven projection method for quadratic programmingcited by 5
- 2024Stability and Generalization for Stochastic Recursive Momentum-based Algorithms for (Strongly-)Convex One to K-Level Stochastic Optimizationscited by 2
- 2022Learning Sparsity and Randomness for Data-driven Low Rank Approximationcited by 0
- 2025Provably data-driven projection method for quadratic programming3 Sep 2025
- 2024Algorithm Configuration for Structured Pfaffian Settings6 Sep 2024
- 2024Stability and Generalization for Stochastic Recursive Momentum-based Algorithms for (Strongly-)Convex One to K-Level Stochastic Optimizations7 Jul 2024
- 2023Generalization Bound and Learning Methods for Data-Driven Projections in Linear Programming1 Sep 2023
- 2022Learning Sparsity and Randomness for Data-driven Low Rank Approximation15 Dec 2022