Weakly Supervised Medical Image Segmentation With Soft Labels and Noise Robust Loss
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in deep learning algorithms have led to significant benefits for solving many medical image analysis problems. Training deep learning models commonly requires large datasets with expert-labeled annotations. However, acquiring expert-labeled annotation is not only expensive but also is subjective, error-prone, and inter-/intra- observer variability introduces noise to labels. This is particularly a problem when using deep learning models for segmenting medical images due to the ambiguous anatomical boundaries. Image-based medical diagnosis tools using deep learning models trained with incorrect segmentation labels can lead to false diagnoses and treatment suggestions. Multi-rater annotations might be better suited to train deep learning models with small training sets compared to single-rater annotations. The aim of this paper was to develop and evaluate a method to generate probabilistic labels based on multi-rater annotations and anatomical knowledge of the lesion features in MRI and a method to train segmentation models using probabilistic labels using normalized active-passive loss as a "noise-tolerant loss" function. The model was evaluated by comparing it to binary ground truth for 17 knees MRI scans for clinical segmentation and detection of bone marrow lesions (BML). The proposed method successfully improved precision 14, recall 22, and Dice score 8 percent compared to a binary cross-entropy loss function. Overall, the results of this work suggest that the proposed normalized active-passive loss using soft labels successfully mitigated the effects of noisy labels.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2022.
Builds on
25 of 40 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
- 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
- 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
- 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
- 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
- 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
13 more
- 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
- 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
- 2018Semi-Supervised Semantic Image Segmentation with Self-correcting Networkscited by 37
- 2021Spatially Varying Label Smoothing: Capturing Uncertainty from Expert Annotationscited by 31
- 2020SoftSeg: Advantages of soft versus binary training for image segmentationcited by 26
- 2021Using Soft Labels to Model Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 18
- 2021Learning from Pixel-Level Label Noise: A New Perspective for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 16
- 2019Soft labeling by Distilling Anatomical knowledge for Improved MS Lesion Segmentationcited by 11
- 2019Optimization with soft Dice can lead to a volumetric biascited by 9
- 2019A Soft STAPLE Algorithm Combined with Anatomical Knowledgecited by 7
- 2020Superpixel-Guided Label Softening for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 6
- 2021Improved-Mask R-CNN: Towards an Accurate Generic MSK MRI instance segmentation platform (Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative)cited by 3
- 2021Sample Efficient Learning of Image-Based Diagnostic Classifiers Using Probabilistic Labelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.