mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reinforcement Learning-Based Cooperative P2P Power Trading between DC Nanogrid Clusters with Wind and PV Energy Resources

arXiv 2209.07744 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2022cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy resources for carbon neutrality, the unbalanced resource production of intermittent wind and photovoltaic (PV) power is a critical issue for peer-to-peer (P2P) power trading. To address this issue, a reinforcement learning (RL) technique is introduced in this paper. For RL, a graph convolutional network (GCN) and a bi-directional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) network are jointly applied to P2P power trading between nanogrid clusters, based on cooperative game theory. The flexible and reliable DC nanogrid is suitable for integrating renewable energy for a distribution system. Each local nanogrid cluster takes the position of prosumer, focusing on power production and consumption simultaneously. For the power management of nanogrid cluster, multi-objective optimization is applied to each local nanogrid cluster with the Internet of Things (IoT) technology. Charging/discharging of an electric vehicle (EV) is executed considering the intermittent characteristics of wind and PV power production. RL algorithms, such as GCN- convolutional neural network (CNN) layers for deep Q-learning network (DQN), GCN-LSTM layers for deep recurrent Q-learning network (DRQN), GCN-Bi-LSTM layers for DRQN, and GCN-Bi-LSTM layers for proximal policy optimization (PPO), are used for simulations. Consequently, the cooperative P2P power trading system maximizes the profit by considering the time of use (ToU) tariff-based electricity cost and the system marginal price (SMP), and minimizes the amount of grid power consumption. Power management of nanogrid clusters with P2P power trading is simulated on a distribution test feeder in real time, and the proposed GCN-Bi-LSTM-PPO technique achieving the lowest electricity cost among the RL algorithms used for comparison reduces the electricity cost by 36.7%, averaging over nanogrid clusters.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2022.

Builds on

12 of 74 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  3. 2018Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulationcited by 643
  4. 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 457
  5. 2017Untangling Blockchain: A Data Processing View of Blockchain Systemscited by 8
  6. 2022Path Planning of Cleaning Robot with Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  7. 2018Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading with Sustainable User Participation: A Game Theoretic Approachcited by 5
  8. 2022Anomaly Detection of Smart Metering System for Power Management with Battery Storage System/Electric Vehiclecited by 4
  9. 2019A Motivational Game-Theoretic Approach for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in the Smart Gridcited by 3
  10. 2022Development of Charging, Discharging Scheduling Algorithm for Economical and Energy Efficient Operation of Multi EV Charging Stationcited by 3
  11. 2018A Study of Energy Trading in a Low-Voltage Network: Centralised and Distributed Approachescited by 2
  12. 2021Optimal Scheduling of Energy Storage for Power System with Capability of Sensing Short-term Future PV Power Productioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.