How people talk about each other: Modeling Generalized Intergroup Bias and Emotion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current studies of bias in NLP rely mainly on identifying (unwanted or negative) bias towards a specific demographic group. While this has led to progress recognizing and mitigating negative bias, and having a clear notion of the targeted group is necessary, it is not always practical. In this work we extrapolate to a broader notion of bias, rooted in social science and psychology literature. We move towards predicting interpersonal group relationship (IGR) - modeling the relationship between the speaker and the target in an utterance - using fine-grained interpersonal emotions as an anchor. We build and release a dataset of English tweets by US Congress members annotated for interpersonal emotion -- the first of its kind, and 'found supervision' for IGR labels; our analyses show that subtle emotional signals are indicative of different biases. While humans can perform better than chance at identifying IGR given an utterance, we show that neural models perform much better; furthermore, a shared encoding between IGR and interpersonal perceived emotion enabled performance gains in both tasks. Data and code for this paper are available at https://github.com/venkatasg/interpersonal-bias
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2022.
Builds on
13 of 32 references.
References · 13
- 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
- 2020GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotionscited by 479
- 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 414
- 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 377
- 2020BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweetscited by 346
- 2013Crowdsourcing a Word-Emotion Association Lexiconcited by 193
- 2020Unsupervised Domain Clusters in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 160
- 2020Towards Controllable Biases in Language Generationcited by 112
- 2019Automatically Neutralizing Subjective Bias in Textcited by 105
- 2020Parametric UMAP embeddings for representation and semi-supervised learningcited by 103
- 2019Gender-preserving Debiasing for Pre-trained Word Embeddingscited by 61
- 2020Detecting Perceived Emotions in Hurricane Disasterscited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023NBIAS: A Natural Language Processing Framework for Bias Identification in Textcited by 23
- 2025Language Models Predict Empathy Gaps Between Social In-groups and Out-groupscited by 6
- 2023Unlocking Bias Detection: Leveraging Transformer-Based Models for Content Analysiscited by 4
- 2023Counterfactual Probing for the Influence of Affect and Specificity on Intergroup Biascited by 2
- 2026Multimodal QUD: Inquisitive Questions from Scientific Figurescited by 0
- 2026Multimodal QUD: Inquisitive Questions from Scientific Figures26 Apr 2026
- 2025Language Models Predict Empathy Gaps Between Social In-groups and Out-groups2 Mar 2025
- 2023Unlocking Bias Detection: Leveraging Transformer-Based Models for Content Analysis30 Sep 2023
- 2023NBIAS: A Natural Language Processing Framework for Bias Identification in Text3 Aug 2023
- 2023Counterfactual Probing for the Influence of Affect and Specificity on Intergroup Bias25 May 2023