Sparse deep neural networks for modeling aluminum electrolysis dynamics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks have become very popular in modeling complex nonlinear processes due to their extraordinary ability to fit arbitrary nonlinear functions from data with minimal expert intervention. However, they are almost always overparameterized and challenging to interpret due to their internal complexity. Furthermore, the optimization process to find the learned model parameters can be unstable due to the process getting stuck in local minima. In this work, we demonstrate the value of sparse regularization techniques to significantly reduce the model complexity. We demonstrate this for the case of an aluminium extraction process, which is highly nonlinear system with many interrelated subprocesses. We trained a densely connected deep neural network to model the process and then compared the effects of sparsity promoting l1 regularization on generalizability, interpretability, and training stability. We found that the regularization significantly reduces model complexity compared to a corresponding dense neural network. We argue that this makes the model more interpretable, and show that training an ensemble of sparse neural networks with different parameter initializations often converges to similar model structures with similar learned input features. Furthermore, the empirical study shows that the resulting sparse models generalize better from small training sets than their dense counterparts.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2022.
Builds on
13 of 49 references.
References · 13
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
- 2021Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networkscited by 527
- 2014On the Number of Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 381
- 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
- 2017Bounding and Counting Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 161
- 2013On the number of response regions of deep feed forward networks with piece-wise linear activationscited by 94
- 2020Physics guided machine learning using simplified theoriescited by 23
- 2021Deep neural network enabled corrective source term approach to hybrid analysis and modelingcited by 16
- 2021Hybrid analysis and modeling, eclecticism, and multifidelity computing toward digital twin revolutioncited by 14
- 2021Sparse Bayesian Deep Learning for Dynamic System Identificationcited by 9
- 2019On improving deep learning generalization with adaptive sparse connectivitycited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2.
3 papers.