mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Concept-Based Explanations for Tabular Data

arXiv 2209.05690 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2022cs.LG cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The interpretability of machine learning models has been an essential area of research for the safe deployment of machine learning systems. One particular approach is to attribute model decisions to high-level concepts that humans can understand. However, such concept-based explainability for Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has been studied mostly on image domain. In this paper, we extend TCAV, the concept attribution approach, to tabular learning, by providing an idea on how to define concepts over tabular data. On a synthetic dataset with ground-truth concept explanations and a real-world dataset, we show the validity of our method in generating interpretability results that match the human-level intuitions. On top of this, we propose a notion of fairness based on TCAV that quantifies what layer of DNN has learned representations that lead to biased predictions of the model. Also, we empirically demonstrate the relation of TCAV-based fairness to a group fairness notion, Demographic Parity.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2022.

Builds on

11 of 17 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  4. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
  5. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  6. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  7. 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 695
  8. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
  9. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
  10. 2018Learning to Explain: An Information-Theoretic Perspective on Model Interpretationcited by 248
  11. 2016Grad-CAM: Why did you say that?cited by 159

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.