mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detecting Network-based Internet Censorship via Latent Feature Representation Learning

arXiv 2209.05152 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2022cs.LG cs.CR cs.NIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Internet censorship is a phenomenon of societal importance and attracts investigation from multiple disciplines. Several research groups, such as Censored Planet, have deployed large scale Internet measurement platforms to collect network reachability data. However, existing studies generally rely on manually designed rules (i.e., using censorship fingerprints) to detect network-based Internet censorship from the data. While this rule-based approach yields a high true positive detection rate, it suffers from several challenges: it requires human expertise, is laborious, and cannot detect any censorship not captured by the rules. Seeking to overcome these challenges, we design and evaluate a classification model based on latent feature representation learning and an image-based classification model to detect network-based Internet censorship. To infer latent feature representations fromnetwork reachability data, we propose a sequence-to-sequence autoencoder to capture the structure and the order of data elements in the data. To estimate the probability of censorship events from the inferred latent features, we rely on a densely connected multi-layer neural network model. Our image-based classification model encodes a network reachability data record as a gray-scale image and classifies the image as censored or not using a dense convolutional neural network. We compare and evaluate both approaches using data sets from Censored Planet via a hold-out evaluation. Both classification models are capable of detecting network-based Internet censorship as we were able to identify instances of censorship not detected by the known fingerprints. Latent feature representations likely encode more nuances in the data since the latent feature learning approach discovers a greater quantity, and a more diverse set, of new censorship instances.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2022.

Builds on

15 of 63 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  3. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  4. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  5. 2021Per-Pixel Classification is Not All You Need for Semantic Segmentationcited by 1,148
  6. 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
  7. 2020On Hyperparameter Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms: Theory and Practicecited by 181
  8. 2020Deep Learning based Vulnerability Detection: Are We There Yet?cited by 142
  9. 2019Scheduled Sampling for Transformerscited by 46
  10. 2020High Performance I/O For Large Scale Deep Learningcited by 25
  11. 2017DenseNet for Dense Flowcited by 15
  12. 2013The Velocity of Censorship: High-Fidelity Detection of Microblog Post Deletionscited by 3
3 more
  1. 2013The Anatomy of Web Censorship in Pakistancited by 2
  2. 2018Where The Light Gets In: Analyzing Web Censorship Mechanisms in Indiacited by 2
  3. 2019ICLab: A Global, Longitudinal Internet Censorship Measurement Platformcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.