mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bias Challenges in Counterfactual Data Augmentation

arXiv 2209.05104 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models tend not to be out-of-distribution robust primarily due to their reliance on spurious features to solve the task. Counterfactual data augmentations provide a general way of (approximately) achieving representations that are counterfactual-invariant to spurious features, a requirement for out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness. In this work, we show that counterfactual data augmentations may not achieve the desired counterfactual-invariance if the augmentation is performed by a context-guessing machine, an abstract machine that guesses the most-likely context of a given input. We theoretically analyze the invariance imposed by such counterfactual data augmentations and describe an exemplar NLP task where counterfactual data augmentation by a context-guessing machine does not lead to robust OOD classifiers.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2022.

Builds on

18 of 23 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  2. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  3. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
  4. 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 488
  5. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 428
  6. 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 308
  7. 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
  8. 2021Invariance Principle Meets Information Bottleneck for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 220
  9. 2018Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processingcited by 210
  10. 2019Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphologycited by 200
  11. 2021Counterfactual Generative Networkscited by 111
  12. 2019It's All in the Name: Mitigating Gender Bias with Name-Based Counterfactual Data Substitutioncited by 102
6 more
  1. 2017Measuring the tendency of CNNs to Learn Surface Statistical Regularitiescited by 87
  2. 2021Desiderata for Representation Learning: A Causal Perspectivecited by 76
  3. 2020Learning What Makes a Difference from Counterfactual Examples and Gradient Supervisioncited by 66
  4. 2020Explaining The Efficacy of Counterfactually Augmented Datacited by 64
  5. 2021An Investigation of the (In)effectiveness of Counterfactually Augmented Datacited by 42
  6. 2020Accounting for Unobserved Confounding in Domain Generalizationcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

3 papers.