Bias Challenges in Counterfactual Data Augmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning models tend not to be out-of-distribution robust primarily due to their reliance on spurious features to solve the task. Counterfactual data augmentations provide a general way of (approximately) achieving representations that are counterfactual-invariant to spurious features, a requirement for out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness. In this work, we show that counterfactual data augmentations may not achieve the desired counterfactual-invariance if the augmentation is performed by a context-guessing machine, an abstract machine that guesses the most-likely context of a given input. We theoretically analyze the invariance imposed by such counterfactual data augmentations and describe an exemplar NLP task where counterfactual data augmentation by a context-guessing machine does not lead to robust OOD classifiers.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2022.
Builds on
18 of 23 references.
References · 18
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
- 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 488
- 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 428
- 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 308
- 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
- 2021Invariance Principle Meets Information Bottleneck for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 220
- 2018Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processingcited by 210
- 2019Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphologycited by 200
- 2021Counterfactual Generative Networkscited by 111
- 2019It's All in the Name: Mitigating Gender Bias with Name-Based Counterfactual Data Substitutioncited by 102
6 more
- 2017Measuring the tendency of CNNs to Learn Surface Statistical Regularitiescited by 87
- 2021Desiderata for Representation Learning: A Causal Perspectivecited by 76
- 2020Learning What Makes a Difference from Counterfactual Examples and Gradient Supervisioncited by 66
- 2020Explaining The Efficacy of Counterfactually Augmented Datacited by 64
- 2021An Investigation of the (In)effectiveness of Counterfactually Augmented Datacited by 42
- 2020Accounting for Unobserved Confounding in Domain Generalizationcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
3 papers.