Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Bounds under Sample Selection with an Application to the Effects of Social Media on Political Polarization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a method for estimation and inference for bounds for heterogeneous causal effect parameters in general sample selection models where the treatment can affect whether an outcome is observed and no exclusion restrictions are available. The method provides conditional effect bounds as functions of policy relevant pre-treatment variables. It allows for conducting valid statistical inference on the unidentified conditional effects. We use a flexible debiased/double machine learning approach that can accommodate non-linear functional forms and high-dimensional confounders. Easily verifiable high-level conditions for estimation, misspecification robust confidence intervals, and uniform confidence bands are provided as well. We re-analyze data from a large scale field experiment on Facebook on counter-attitudinal news subscription with attrition. Our method yields substantially tighter effect bounds compared to conventional methods and suggests depolarization effects for younger users.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2022.
Builds on
7 of 61 references.
References · 7
- 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 600
- 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 312
- 2018Graphical Models for Processing Missing Datacited by 58
- 2013Robust Inference on Average Treatment Effects with Possibly More Covariates than Observationscited by 38
- 2020Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platformscited by 30
- 2016Doubly Robust Uniform Confidence Band for the Conditional Average Treatment Effect Functioncited by 7
- 2017Debiased Machine Learning of Set-Identified Linear Modelscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.