Alignment-based conformance checking over probabilistic events
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conformance checking techniques allow us to evaluate how well some exhibited behaviour, represented by a trace of monitored events, conforms to a specified process model. Modern monitoring and activity recognition technologies, such as those relying on sensors, the IoT, statistics and AI, can produce a wealth of relevant event data. However, this data is typically characterised by noise and uncertainty, in contrast to the assumption of a deterministic event log required by conformance checking algorithms. In this paper, we extend alignment-based conformance checking to function under a probabilistic event log. We introduce a weighted trace model and weighted alignment cost function, and a custom threshold parameter that controls the level of confidence on the event data vs. the process model. The resulting algorithm considers activities of lower but sufficiently high probability that better align with the process model. We explain the algorithm and its motivation both from formal and intuitive perspectives, and demonstrate its functionality in comparison with deterministic alignment using real-life datasets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2022.
Builds on
7 of 23 references.
References · 7
- 2019Process Mining for Python (PM4Py): Bridging the Gap Between Process- and Data Sciencecited by 33
- 2020Conformance Checking over Uncertain Event Datacited by 13
- 2021Uncertain Process Data with Probabilistic Knowledge: Problem Characterization and Challengescited by 7
- 2022Conformance Checking Over Stochastically Known Logscited by 7
- 2020Efficient Construction of Behavior Graphs for Uncertain Event Datacited by 6
- 2021Probabilistic Trace Alignmentcited by 6
- 2022Conformance Checking with Uncertainty via SMT (Extended Version)cited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.