mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explanation Method for Anomaly Detection on Mixed Numerical and Categorical Spaces

arXiv 2209.04173 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most proposals in the anomaly detection field focus exclusively on the detection stage, specially in the recent deep learning approaches. While providing highly accurate predictions, these models often lack transparency, acting as "black boxes". This criticism has grown to the point that explanation is now considered very relevant in terms of acceptability and reliability. In this paper, we addressed this issue by inspecting the ADMNC (Anomaly Detection on Mixed Numerical and Categorical Spaces) model, an existing very accurate although opaque anomaly detector capable to operate with both numerical and categorical inputs. This work presents the extension EADMNC (Explainable Anomaly Detection on Mixed Numerical and Categorical spaces), which adds explainability to the predictions obtained with the original model. We preserved the scalability of the original method thanks to the Apache Spark framework. EADMNC leverages the formulation of the previous ADMNC model to offer pre hoc and post hoc explainability, while maintaining the accuracy of the original architecture. We present a pre hoc model that globally explains the outputs by segmenting input data into homogeneous groups, described with only a few variables. We designed a graphical representation based on regression trees, which supervisors can inspect to understand the differences between normal and anomalous data. Our post hoc explanations consist of a text-based template method that locally provides textual arguments supporting each detection. We report experimental results on extensive real-world data, particularly in the domain of network intrusion detection. The usefulness of the explanations is assessed by theory analysis using expert knowledge in the network intrusion domain.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2022.

Builds on

18 of 86 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 423
  4. 2016Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization Layerscited by 197
  5. 2020Explainable Deep One-Class Classificationcited by 126
  6. 2019Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 106
  7. 2019Towards Best Practice in Explaining Neural Network Decisions with LRPcited by 70
  8. 2021Explainable Deep Few-shot Anomaly Detection with Deviation Networkscited by 69
  9. 2019Explainable AI for Trees: From Local Explanations to Global Understandingcited by 64
  10. 2019Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AIcited by 63
  11. 2020Interpretability and Explainability: A Machine Learning Zoo Mini-tourcited by 55
  12. 2019GEE: A Gradient-based Explainable Variational Autoencoder for Network Anomaly Detectioncited by 36
6 more
  1. 2019Explaining Anomalies Detected by Autoencoders Using SHAPcited by 27
  2. 2021An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach for Unsupervised Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Rotating Machinerycited by 22
  3. 2021Explainable Machine Learning for Fraud Detectioncited by 9
  4. 2019Rule Extraction in Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Model Explainability: Application to OneClass SVMcited by 8
  5. 2021Why Are You Weird? Infusing Interpretability in Isolation Forest for Anomaly Detectioncited by 5
  6. 2021Locally Interpretable One-Class Anomaly Detection for Credit Card Fraud Detectioncited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.