mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Goodness of Pronunciation Pipelines for OOV Problem

arXiv 2209.03787 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2022cs.CL cs.SD eess.AScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the following report we propose pipelines for Goodness of Pronunciation (GoP) computation solving OOV problem at testing time using Vocab/Lexicon expansion techniques. The pipeline uses different components of ASR system to quantify accent and automatically evaluate them as scores. We use the posteriors of an ASR model trained on native English speech, along with the phone level boundaries to obtain phone level pronunciation scores. We used this as a baseline pipeline and implemented methods to remove UNK and SPN phonemes in the GoP output by building three pipelines. The Online, Offline and Hybrid pipeline which returns the scores but also can prevent unknown words in the final output. The Online method is based per utterance, Offline method pre-incorporates a set of OOV words for a given data set and the Hybrid method combines the above two ideas to expand the lexicon as well work per utterance. We further provide utilities such as the Phoneme to posterior mappings, GoP scores of each utterance as a vector, and Word boundaries used in the GoP pipeline for use in future research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2022.

Builds on

5 of 46 references.

References · 5

  1. 2019Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpuscited by 1,358
  2. 2020Context-aware Goodness of Pronunciation for Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Trainingcited by 26
  3. 2022Accented Speech Recognition: Benchmarking, Pre-training, and Diverse Datacited by 15
  4. 2022Language technology practitioners as language managers: arbitrating data bias and predictive bias in ASRcited by 7
  5. 2021Are E2E ASR models ready for an industrial usage?cited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.