mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robots as Mental Well-being Coaches: Design and Ethical Recommendations

arXiv 2208.14874 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2022cs.HC cs.ROcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The last decade has shown a growing interest in robots as well-being coaches. However, insightful guidelines for the design of robots as coaches to promote mental well-being have not yet been proposed. This paper details design and ethical recommendations based on a qualitative analysis drawing on a grounded theory approach, which was conducted with a three-step iterative design process which included user-centered design studies involving robotic well-being coaches, namely: (1) a user-centred design study conducted with 11 participants consisting of both prospective users who had participated in a Brief Solution-Focused Practice study with a human coach, as well as coaches of different disciplines, (2) semi-structured individual interview data gathered from 20 participants attending a Positive Psychology intervention study with the robotic well-being coach Pepper, and (3) a user-centred design study conducted with 3 participants of the Positive Psychology study as well as 2 relevant well-being coaches. After conducting a thematic analysis and a qualitative analysis, we collated the data gathered into convergent and divergent themes, and we distilled from those results a set of design guidelines and ethical considerations. Our findings can inform researchers and roboticists on the key aspects to take into account when designing robotic mental well-being coaches.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.