Text Difficulty Study: Do machines behave the same as humans regarding text difficulty?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given a task, human learns from easy to hard, whereas the model learns randomly. Undeniably, difficulty insensitive learning leads to great success in NLP, but little attention has been paid to the effect of text difficulty in NLP. In this research, we propose the Human Learning Matching Index (HLM Index) to investigate the effect of text difficulty. Experiment results show: (1) LSTM has more human-like learning behavior than BERT. (2) UID-SuperLinear gives the best evaluation of text difficulty among four text difficulty criteria. (3) Among nine tasks, some tasks' performance is related to text difficulty, whereas some are not. (4) Model trained on easy data performs best in easy and medium data, whereas trains on a hard level only perform well on hard data. (5) Training the model from easy to hard leads to fast convergence.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2022.
Builds on
10 of 29 references.
References · 10
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
- 2021Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesiscited by 68
- 2020Human Sentence Processing: Recurrence or Attention?cited by 51
- 2021Multilingual Language Models Predict Human Reading Behaviorcited by 29
- 2021Relative Importance in Sentence Processingcited by 22
- 2021Decoding EEG Brain Activity for Multi-Modal Natural Language Processingcited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.