mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep learning for automatic head and neck lymph node level delineation provides expert-level accuracy

arXiv 2208.13224 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2022eess.IV cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Background: Deep learning (DL)-based head and neck lymph node level (HN_LNL) autodelineation is of high relevance to radiotherapy research and clinical treatment planning but still underinvestigated in academic literature. Methods: An expert-delineated cohort of 35 planning CTs was used for training of an nnU-net 3D-fullres/2D-ensemble model for autosegmentation of 20 different HN_LNL. A second cohort acquired at the same institution later in time served as the test set (n=20). In a completely blinded evaluation, 3 clinical experts rated the quality of DL autosegmentations in a head-to-head comparison with expert-created contours. For a subgroup of 10 cases, intraobserver variability was compared to the average DL autosegmentation accuracy on the original and recontoured set of expert segmentations. A postprocessing step to adjust craniocaudal boundaries of level autosegmentations to the CT slice plane was introduced and the effect on geometric accuracy and expert rating was investigated. Results: Blinded expert ratings for DL segmentations and expert-created contours were not significantly different. DL segmentations with slice plane adjustment were rated numerically higher (mean, 81.0 vs. 79.6,p=0.185) and DL segmentations without slice plane adjustment were rated numerically lower (77.2 vs. 79.6,p=0.167) than manually drawn contours. DL segmentations with CT slice plane adjustment were rated significantly better than DL contours without slice plane adjustment (81.0 vs. 77.2,p=0.004). Geometric accuracy of DL segmentations was not different from intraobserver variability (mean, 0.76 vs. 0.77, p=0.307). Conclusions: We show that a nnU-net 3D-fullres/2D-ensemble model can be used for highly accurate autodelineation of HN_LNL using only a limited training dataset that is ideally suited for large-scale standardized autodelineation of HN_LNL in the research setting.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2022.

Builds on

7 of 51 references.

References · 7

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 511
  4. 2016Efficient Multi-Scale 3D CNN with Fully Connected CRF for Accurate Brain Lesion Segmentationcited by 263
  5. 2021Medical Image Segmentation with 3D Convolutional Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 16
  6. 2019Robustness of Brain Tumor Segmentationcited by 2
  7. 2021Comparative Evaluation of 3D and 2D Deep Learning Techniques for Semantic Segmentation in CT Scanscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

6 papers.