Deep learning for automatic head and neck lymph node level delineation provides expert-level accuracy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Background: Deep learning (DL)-based head and neck lymph node level (HN_LNL) autodelineation is of high relevance to radiotherapy research and clinical treatment planning but still underinvestigated in academic literature. Methods: An expert-delineated cohort of 35 planning CTs was used for training of an nnU-net 3D-fullres/2D-ensemble model for autosegmentation of 20 different HN_LNL. A second cohort acquired at the same institution later in time served as the test set (n=20). In a completely blinded evaluation, 3 clinical experts rated the quality of DL autosegmentations in a head-to-head comparison with expert-created contours. For a subgroup of 10 cases, intraobserver variability was compared to the average DL autosegmentation accuracy on the original and recontoured set of expert segmentations. A postprocessing step to adjust craniocaudal boundaries of level autosegmentations to the CT slice plane was introduced and the effect on geometric accuracy and expert rating was investigated. Results: Blinded expert ratings for DL segmentations and expert-created contours were not significantly different. DL segmentations with slice plane adjustment were rated numerically higher (mean, 81.0 vs. 79.6,p=0.185) and DL segmentations without slice plane adjustment were rated numerically lower (77.2 vs. 79.6,p=0.167) than manually drawn contours. DL segmentations with CT slice plane adjustment were rated significantly better than DL contours without slice plane adjustment (81.0 vs. 77.2,p=0.004). Geometric accuracy of DL segmentations was not different from intraobserver variability (mean, 0.76 vs. 0.77, p=0.307). Conclusions: We show that a nnU-net 3D-fullres/2D-ensemble model can be used for highly accurate autodelineation of HN_LNL using only a limited training dataset that is ideally suited for large-scale standardized autodelineation of HN_LNL in the research setting.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2022.
Builds on
7 of 51 references.
References · 7
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 511
- 2016Efficient Multi-Scale 3D CNN with Fully Connected CRF for Accurate Brain Lesion Segmentationcited by 263
- 2021Medical Image Segmentation with 3D Convolutional Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 16
- 2019Robustness of Brain Tumor Segmentationcited by 2
- 2021Comparative Evaluation of 3D and 2D Deep Learning Techniques for Semantic Segmentation in CT Scanscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Fine-Tuning a Local LLaMA-3 Large Language Model for Automated Privacy-Preserving Physician Letter Generation in Radiation Oncologycited by 8
- 2023A Survey of Incremental Transfer Learning: Combining Peer-to-Peer Federated Learning and Domain Incremental Learning for Multicenter Collaborationcited by 4
- 2023Benchmarking ChatGPT-4 on ACR Radiation Oncology In-Training (TXIT) Exam and Red Journal Gray Zone Cases: Potentials and Challenges for AI-Assisted Medical Education and Decision Making in Radiation Oncologycited by 3
- 2023Deep Learning for Cancer Prognosis Prediction Using Portrait Photos by StyleGAN Embeddingcited by 2
- 2024Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation of Planning Target Volume for Total Marrow and Lymph Node Irradiationcited by 0
- 2025Benchmarking GPT-5 in Radiation Oncology: Measurable Gains, but Persistent Need for Expert Oversightcited by 0
- 2025Benchmarking GPT-5 in Radiation Oncology: Measurable Gains, but Persistent Need for Expert Oversight29 Aug 2025
- 2024Fine-Tuning a Local LLaMA-3 Large Language Model for Automated Privacy-Preserving Physician Letter Generation in Radiation Oncology20 Aug 2024
- 2024Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation of Planning Target Volume for Total Marrow and Lymph Node Irradiation9 Feb 2024
- 2023A Survey of Incremental Transfer Learning: Combining Peer-to-Peer Federated Learning and Domain Incremental Learning for Multicenter Collaboration29 Sep 2023
- 2023Deep Learning for Cancer Prognosis Prediction Using Portrait Photos by StyleGAN Embedding26 Jun 2023
- 2023Benchmarking ChatGPT-4 on ACR Radiation Oncology In-Training (TXIT) Exam and Red Journal Gray Zone Cases: Potentials and Challenges for AI-Assisted Medical Education and Decision Making in Radiation Oncology24 Apr 2023