Measuring the Prevalence of Anti-Social Behavior in Online Communities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With increasing attention to online anti-social behaviors such as personal attacks and bigotry, it is critical to have an accurate accounting of how widespread anti-social behaviors are. In this paper, we empirically measure the prevalence of anti-social behavior in one of the world's most popular online community platforms. We operationalize this goal as measuring the proportion of unmoderated comments in the 97 most popular communities on Reddit that violate eight widely accepted platform norms. To achieve this goal, we contribute a human-AI pipeline for identifying these violations and a bootstrap sampling method to quantify measurement uncertainty. We find that 6.25% (95% Confidence Interval [5.36%, 7.13%]) of all comments in 2016, and 4.28% (95% CI [2.50%, 6.26%]) in 2020-2021, are violations of these norms. Most anti-social behaviors remain unmoderated: moderators only removed one in twenty violating comments in 2016, and one in ten violating comments in 2020. Personal attacks were the most prevalent category of norm violation; pornography and bigotry were the most likely to be moderated, while politically inflammatory comments and misogyny/vulgarity were the least likely to be moderated. This paper offers a method and set of empirical results for tracking these phenomena as both the social practices (e.g., moderation) and technical practices (e.g., design) evolve.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.
6 papers.
- 2023Rehearsal: Simulating Conflict to Teach Conflict Resolutioncited by 55
- 2024SLM-Mod: Small Language Models Surpass LLMs at Content Moderationcited by 27
- 2024HateDay: Insights from a Global Hate Speech Dataset Representative of a Day on Twittercited by 13
- 2025MoMoE: Mixture of Moderation Experts Framework for AI-Assisted Online Governancecited by 13
- 2025Playing Devil's Advocate: Unmasking Toxicity and Vulnerabilities in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025Queuing for Civility: Regulating Emotions and Reducing Toxicity in Digital Discoursecited by 0
- 2025Queuing for Civility: Regulating Emotions and Reducing Toxicity in Digital Discourse31 Aug 2025
- 2025MoMoE: Mixture of Moderation Experts Framework for AI-Assisted Online Governance20 May 2025
- 2025Playing Devil's Advocate: Unmasking Toxicity and Vulnerabilities in Large Vision-Language Models14 Jan 2025
- 2024HateDay: Insights from a Global Hate Speech Dataset Representative of a Day on Twitter23 Nov 2024
- 2024SLM-Mod: Small Language Models Surpass LLMs at Content Moderation17 Oct 2024
- 2023Rehearsal: Simulating Conflict to Teach Conflict Resolution21 Sep 2023