mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pipeline-Invariant Representation Learning for Neuroimaging

arXiv 2208.12909 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2022cs.LG eess.IVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning has been widely applied in neuroimaging, including predicting brain-phenotype relationships from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumes. MRI data usually requires extensive preprocessing prior to modeling, but variation introduced by different MRI preprocessing pipelines may lead to different scientific findings, even when using the identical data. Motivated by the data-centric perspective, we first evaluate how preprocessing pipeline selection can impact the downstream performance of a supervised learning model. We next propose two pipeline-invariant representation learning methodologies, MPSL and PXL, to improve robustness in classification performance and to capture similar neural network representations. Using 2000 human subjects from the UK Biobank dataset, we demonstrate that proposed models present unique and shared advantages, in particular that MPSL can be used to improve out-of-sample generalization to new pipelines, while PXL can be used to improve within-sample prediction performance. Both MPSL and PXL can learn more similar between-pipeline representations. These results suggest that our proposed models can be applied to mitigate pipeline-related biases, and to improve prediction robustness in brain-phenotype modeling.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2022.

Builds on

20 of 63 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  5. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,048
  6. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  7. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,838
  8. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  9. 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,297
  10. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
  11. 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 763
  12. 2019Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Viewscited by 733
8 more
  1. 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 511
  2. 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 318
  3. 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 241
  4. 2019Variational Mixture-of-Experts Autoencoders for Multi-Modal Deep Generative Modelscited by 177
  5. 2016On Deep Multi-View Representation Learning: Objectives and Optimizationcited by 162
  6. 2020Why Do Better Loss Functions Lead to Less Transferable Features?cited by 73
  7. 2013Deep learning for neuroimaging: a validation studycited by 21
  8. 2020Self-Supervised Multimodal Domino: in Search of Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Diseasecited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.