mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FocusFormer: Focusing on What We Need via Architecture Sampler

arXiv 2208.10861 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision Transformers (ViTs) have underpinned the recent breakthroughs in computer vision. However, designing the architectures of ViTs is laborious and heavily relies on expert knowledge. To automate the design process and incorporate deployment flexibility, one-shot neural architecture search decouples the supernet training and architecture specialization for diverse deployment scenarios. To cope with an enormous number of sub-networks in the supernet, existing methods treat all architectures equally important and randomly sample some of them in each update step during training. During architecture search, these methods focus on finding architectures on the Pareto frontier of performance and resource consumption, which forms a gap between training and deployment. In this paper, we devise a simple yet effective method, called FocusFormer, to bridge such a gap. To this end, we propose to learn an architecture sampler to assign higher sampling probabilities to those architectures on the Pareto frontier under different resource constraints during supernet training, making them sufficiently optimized and hence improving their performance. During specialization, we can directly use the well-trained architecture sampler to obtain accurate architectures satisfying the given resource constraint, which significantly improves the search efficiency. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-100 and ImageNet show that our FocusFormer is able to improve the performance of the searched architectures while significantly reducing the search cost. For example, on ImageNet, our FocusFormer-Ti with 1.4G FLOPs outperforms AutoFormer-Ti by 0.5% in terms of the Top-1 accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 68 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2022.

Builds on

68 of 75 references.

References · 68

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  5. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  6. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  7. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  8. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  9. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  10. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  11. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  12. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
38 more
  1. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  2. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,054
  3. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
  4. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,962
  5. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,798
  6. 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,676
  7. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,499
  8. 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,369
  9. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,239
  10. 2021Per-Pixel Classification is Not All You Need for Semantic Segmentationcited by 1,152
  11. 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
  12. 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,101
  13. 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 960
  14. 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 947
  15. 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 943
  16. 2018Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Searchcited by 909
  17. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 897
  18. 2018Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharingcited by 837
  19. 2019Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient Deploymentcited by 787
  20. 2018ProxylessNAS: Direct Neural Architecture Search on Target Task and Hardwarecited by 673
  21. 2021Transformer in Transformercited by 633
  22. 2021Twins: Revisiting the Design of Spatial Attention in Vision Transformerscited by 565
  23. 2018FBNet: Hardware-Aware Efficient ConvNet Design via Differentiable Neural Architecture Searchcited by 485
  24. 2021ConViT: Improving Vision Transformers with Soft Convolutional Inductive Biasescited by 484
  25. 2021LeViT: a Vision Transformer in ConvNet's Clothing for Faster Inferencecited by 475
  26. 2019Reducing Transformer Depth on Demand with Structured Dropoutcited by 439
  27. 2019Single Path One-Shot Neural Architecture Search with Uniform Samplingcited by 414
  28. 2021Conditional Positional Encodings for Vision Transformerscited by 406
  29. 2021Bottleneck Transformers for Visual Recognitioncited by 364
  30. 2017Large-Scale Evolution of Image Classifierscited by 348
  31. 2021CMT: Convolutional Neural Networks Meet Vision Transformerscited by 310
  32. 2019Random Search and Reproducibility for Neural Architecture Searchcited by 254
  33. 2021LocalViT: Analyzing Locality in Vision Transformerscited by 228
  34. 2021ViTAE: Vision Transformer Advanced by Exploring Intrinsic Inductive Biascited by 216
  35. 2021Rethinking and Improving Relative Position Encoding for Vision Transformercited by 207
  36. 2020BigNAS: Scaling Up Neural Architecture Search with Big Single-Stage Modelscited by 188
  37. 2019The Evolved Transformercited by 180
  38. 2020HAT: Hardware-Aware Transformers for Efficient Natural Language Processingcited by 136

50 most cited of 68 All 68 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.