mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Spiral Contrastive Learning: An Efficient 3D Representation Learning Method for Unannotated CT Lesions

arXiv 2208.10694 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2022cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computed tomography (CT) samples with pathological annotations are difficult to obtain. As a result, the computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) algorithms are trained on small datasets (e.g., LIDC-IDRI with 1,018 samples), limiting their accuracies and reliability. In the past five years, several works have tailored for unsupervised representations of CT lesions via two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) self-supervised learning (SSL) algorithms. The 2D algorithms have difficulty capturing 3D information, and existing 3D algorithms are computationally heavy. Light-weight 3D SSL remains the boundary to explore. In this paper, we propose the spiral contrastive learning (SCL), which yields 3D representations in a computationally efficient manner. SCL first transforms 3D lesions to the 2D plane using an information-preserving spiral transformation, and then learn transformation-invariant features using 2D contrastive learning. For the augmentation, we consider natural image augmentations and medical image augmentations. We evaluate SCL by training a classification head upon the embedding layer. Experimental results show that SCL achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on LIDC-IDRI (89.72%), LNDb (82.09%) and TianChi (90.16%) for unsupervised representation learning. With 10% annotated data for fine-tune, the performance of SCL is comparable to that of supervised learning algorithms (85.75% vs. 85.03% on LIDC-IDRI, 78.20% vs. 73.44% on LNDb and 87.85% vs. 83.34% on TianChi, respectively). Meanwhile, SCL reduces the computational effort by 66.98% compared to other 3D SSL algorithms, demonstrating the efficiency of the proposed method in unsupervised pre-training.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2022.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  6. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  7. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  8. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,586
  9. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,379
  10. 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,297
  11. 2016Colorful Image Colorizationcited by 1,113
  12. 2015Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Predictioncited by 1,062
7 more
  1. 2020Self-supervised Learning: Generative or Contrastivecited by 693
  2. 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
  3. 2019Models Genesis: Generic Autodidactic Models for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 159
  4. 2020Self-supervised Feature Learning via Exploiting Multi-modal Data for Retinal Disease Diagnosiscited by 47
  5. 2019LNDb: A Lung Nodule Database on Computed Tomographycited by 27
  6. 2018An Interpretable Deep Hierarchical Semantic Convolutional Neural Network for Lung Nodule Malignancy Classificationcited by 25
  7. 2021MVCNet: Multiview Contrastive Network for Unsupervised Representation Learning for 3D CT Lesionscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.