Anomaly Attribution with Likelihood Compensation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper addresses the task of explaining anomalous predictions of a black-box regression model. When using a black-box model, such as one to predict building energy consumption from many sensor measurements, we often have a situation where some observed samples may significantly deviate from their prediction. It may be due to a sub-optimal black-box model, or simply because those samples are outliers. In either case, one would ideally want to compute a ``responsibility score'' indicative of the extent to which an input variable is responsible for the anomalous output. In this work, we formalize this task as a statistical inverse problem: Given model deviation from the expected value, infer the responsibility score of each of the input variables. We propose a new method called likelihood compensation (LC), which is founded on the likelihood principle and computes a correction to each input variable. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first principled framework that computes a responsibility score for real valued anomalous model deviations. We apply our approach to a real-world building energy prediction task and confirm its utility based on expert feedback.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2022.
Builds on
11 of 32 references.
References · 11
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
- 2018Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negativescited by 261
- 2018Visualizing the Feature Importance for Black Box Modelscited by 55
- 2019Why Does My Model Fail? Contrastive Local Explanations for Retail Forecastingcited by 31
- 2020Interpretable, Multidimensional, Multimodal Anomaly Detection with Negative Sampling for Detection of Device Failurecited by 27
- 2018Anomaly Detection in the Presence of Missing Valuescited by 6
- 2019ACE -- An Anomaly Contribution Explainer for Cyber-Security Applicationscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023The PetShop Dataset -- Finding Causes of Performance Issues across Microservicescited by 14
- 2023A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Cybersecuritycited by 9
- 2023Generative Perturbation Analysis for Probabilistic Black-Box Anomaly Attributioncited by 6
- 2024Causal-discovery-based root-cause analysis and its application in time-series prediction error diagnosiscited by 3
- 2023Black-Box Anomaly Attributioncited by 1
- 2024A Bayesian explanation of machine learning models based on modes and functional ANOVAcited by 0
- 2025An Identifiable Cost-Aware Causal Decision-Making Framework Using Counterfactual Reasoningcited by 0
- 2025An Identifiable Cost-Aware Causal Decision-Making Framework Using Counterfactual Reasoning13 May 2025
- 2024Causal-discovery-based root-cause analysis and its application in time-series prediction error diagnosis11 Nov 2024
- 2024A Bayesian explanation of machine learning models based on modes and functional ANOVA5 Nov 2024
- 2023The PetShop Dataset -- Finding Causes of Performance Issues across Microservices8 Nov 2023
- 2023Generative Perturbation Analysis for Probabilistic Black-Box Anomaly Attribution9 Aug 2023
- 2023Black-Box Anomaly Attribution29 May 2023
- 2023A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Cybersecurity7 Mar 2023