mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Looking For A Match: Self-supervised Clustering For Automatic Doubt Matching In e-learning Platforms

arXiv 2208.09600 ↗First posted 20 Aug 2022cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, e-learning platforms have grown as a place where students can post doubts (as a snap taken with smart phones) and get them resolved in minutes. However, the significant increase in the number of student-posted doubts with high variance in quality on these platforms not only presents challenges for teachers' navigation to address them but also increases the resolution time per doubt. Both are not acceptable, as high doubt resolution time hinders the students learning progress. This necessitates ways to automatically identify if there exists a similar doubt in repository and then serve it to the teacher as the plausible solution to validate and communicate with the student. Supervised learning techniques (like Siamese architecture) require labels to identify the matches, which is not feasible as labels are scarce and expensive. In this work, we, thus, developed a label-agnostic doubt matching paradigm based on the representations learnt via self-supervised technique. Building on prior theoretical insights of BYOL (bootstrap your own latent space), we propose custom BYOL which combines domain-specific augmentation with contrastive objective over a varied set of appropriately constructed data views. Results highlighted that, custom BYOL improves the top-1 matching accuracy by approximately 6% and 5% as compared to both BYOL and supervised learning instances, respectively. We further show that both BYOL-based learning instances performs either on par or better than human labeling.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2022.

Builds on

21 of 31 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  6. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  7. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  8. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
  9. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  10. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  11. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,591
  12. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
9 more
  1. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
  2. 2015Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Predictioncited by 1,066
  3. 2016Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphscited by 861
  4. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
  5. 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 808
  6. 2016Large-Scale Image Retrieval with Attentive Deep Local Featurescited by 238
  7. 2020Scaled-YOLOv4: Scaling Cross Stage Partial Networkcited by 211
  8. 2020Demystifying Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning: Invariances, Augmentations and Dataset Biasescited by 143
  9. 2022Pushing the limits of self-supervised ResNets: Can we outperform supervised learning without labels on ImageNet?cited by 67

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.