Expressivity of Hidden Markov Chains vs. Recurrent Neural Networks from a system theoretic viewpoint
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hidden Markov Chains (HMC) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) are two well known tools for predicting time series. Even though these solutions were developed independently in distinct communities, they share some similarities when considered as probabilistic structures. So in this paper we first consider HMC and RNN as generative models, and we embed both structures in a common generative unified model (GUM). We next address a comparative study of the expressivity of these models. To that end we assume that the models are furthermore linear and Gaussian. The probability distributions produced by these models are characterized by structured covariance series, and as a consequence expressivity reduces to comparing sets of structured covariance series, which enables us to call for stochastic realization theory (SRT). We finally provide conditions under which a given covariance series can be realized by a GUM, an HMC or an RNN.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2022.
Builds on
7 of 90 references.
References · 7
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
- 2015A Recurrent Latent Variable Model for Sequential Datacited by 362
- 2017The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Widthcited by 318
- 2014Statistical guarantees for the EM algorithm: From population to sample-based analysiscited by 131
- 2014On Particle Methods for Parameter Estimation in State-Space Modelscited by 47
Built on by
Not cited yet.