Seismic fragility analysis using stochastic polynomial chaos expansions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Within the performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) framework, the fragility model plays a pivotal role. Such a model represents the probability that the engineering demand parameter (EDP) exceeds a certain safety threshold given a set of selected intensity measures (IMs) that characterize the earthquake load. The-state-of-the art methods for fragility computation rely on full non-linear time-history analyses. Within this perimeter, there are two main approaches: the first relies on the selection and scaling of recorded ground motions; the second, based on random vibration theory, characterizes the seismic input with a parametric stochastic ground motion model (SGMM). The latter case has the great advantage that the problem of seismic risk analysis is framed as a forward uncertainty quantification problem. However, running classical full-scale Monte Carlo simulations is intractable because of the prohibitive computational cost of typical finite element models. Therefore, it is of great interest to define fragility models that link an EDP of interest with the SGMM parameters -- which are regarded as IMs in this context. The computation of such fragility models is a challenge on its own and, despite few recent studies, there is still an important research gap in this domain. This study tackles this computational challenge by using stochastic polynomial chaos expansions to represent the statistical dependence of EDP on IMs. More precisely, this surrogate model estimates the full conditional probability distribution of EDP conditioned on IMs. We compare the proposed approach with some state-of-the-art methods in two case studies. The numerical results show that the new method prevails its competitors in estimating both the conditional distribution and the fragility functions.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025Neural Operators for Stochastic Modeling of Nonlinear Structural System Response to Natural Hazardscited by 6
- 2025AL-SPCE - Reliability analysis for nondeterministic models using stochastic polynomial chaos expansions and active learningcited by 1
- 2026High-dimensional reliability-based design optimization using stochastic emulatorscited by 1
- 2025MF-GLaM: A multifidelity stochastic emulator using generalized lambda modelscited by 0
- 2026Probabilistic function-on-function nonlinear autoregressive model for emulation and reliability analysis of stochastic dynamical systemscited by 0
- 2026Stochastic Emulation using Generalized Stratified Sampling for Performance-Based Risk Optimization of Structurescited by 0
- 2026Stochastic Emulation using Generalized Stratified Sampling for Performance-Based Risk Optimization of Structures5 Aug 2026
- 2026High-dimensional reliability-based design optimization using stochastic emulators7 Apr 2026
- 2026Probabilistic function-on-function nonlinear autoregressive model for emulation and reliability analysis of stochastic dynamical systems2 Feb 2026
- 2025MF-GLaM: A multifidelity stochastic emulator using generalized lambda models14 Jul 2025
- 2025AL-SPCE - Reliability analysis for nondeterministic models using stochastic polynomial chaos expansions and active learning6 Jul 2025
- 2025Neural Operators for Stochastic Modeling of Nonlinear Structural System Response to Natural Hazards16 Feb 2025