mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Efficient Market Hypothesis for Bitcoin in the context of neural networks

arXiv 2208.07254 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2022q-fin.ST cs.LG q-fin.TRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study examines the weak form of the efficient market hypothesis for Bitcoin using a feedforward neural network. Due to the increasing popularity of cryptocurrencies in recent years, the question has arisen, as to whether market inefficiencies could be exploited in Bitcoin. Several studies we refer to here discuss this topic in the context of Bitcoin using either statistical tests or machine learning methods, mostly relying exclusively on data from Bitcoin itself. Results regarding market efficiency vary from study to study. In this study, however, the focus is on applying various asset-related input features in a neural network. The aim is to investigate whether the prediction accuracy improves when adding equity stock indices (S&P 500, Russell 2000), currencies (EURUSD), 10 Year US Treasury Note Yield as well as Gold&Silver producers index (XAU), in addition to using Bitcoin returns as input feature. As expected, the results show that more features lead to higher training performance from 54.6% prediction accuracy with one feature to 61% with six features. On the test set, we observe that with our neural network methodology, adding additional asset classes, no increase in prediction accuracy is achieved. One feature set is able to partially outperform a buy-and-hold strategy, but the performance drops again as soon as another feature is added. This leads us to the partial conclusion that weak market inefficiencies for Bitcoin cannot be detected using neural networks and the given asset classes as input. Therefore, based on this study, we find evidence that the Bitcoin market is efficient in the sense of the efficient market hypothesis during the sample period. We encourage further research in this area, as much depends on the sample period chosen, the input features, the model architecture, and the hyperparameters.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2022.

Builds on

1 of 57 references.

References · 1

  1. 2014The digital traces of bubbles: feedback cycles between socio-economic signals in the Bitcoin economycited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.