Grasping Core Rules of Time Series through Pure Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Time series underwent the transition from statistics to deep learning, as did many other machine learning fields. Although it appears that the accuracy has been increasing as the model is updated in a number of publicly available datasets, it typically only increases the scale by several times in exchange for a slight difference in accuracy. Through this experiment, we point out a different line of thinking, time series, especially long-term forecasting, may differ from other fields. It is not necessary to use extensive and complex models to grasp all aspects of time series, but to use pure models to grasp the core rules of time series changes. With this simple but effective idea, we created PureTS, a network with three pure linear layers that achieved state-of-the-art in 80% of the long sequence prediction tasks while being nearly the lightest model and having the fastest running speed. On this basis, we discuss the potential of pure linear layers in both phenomena and essence. The ability to understand the core law contributes to the high precision of long-distance prediction, and reasonable fluctuation prevents it from distorting the curve in multi-step prediction like mainstream deep learning models, which is summarized as a pure linear neural network that avoids over-fluctuating. Finally, we suggest the fundamental design standards for lightweight long-step time series tasks: input and output should try to have the same dimension, and the structure avoids fragmentation and complex operations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2022.
Builds on
21 of 40 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,169
- 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,676
- 2020Reformer: The Efficient Transformercited by 1,668
- 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,476
- 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,446
- 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,304
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,136
- 2017Modeling Long- and Short-Term Temporal Patterns with Deep Neural Networkscited by 879
9 more
- 2019Enhancing the Locality and Breaking the Memory Bottleneck of Transformer on Time Series Forecastingcited by 607
- 2020Connecting the Dots: Multivariate Time Series Forecasting with Graph Neural Networkscited by 566
- 2021TS2Vec: Towards Universal Representation of Time Seriescited by 471
- 2017A Dual-Stage Attention-Based Recurrent Neural Network for Time Series Predictioncited by 245
- 2022Less Is More: Fast Multivariate Time Series Forecasting with Light Sampling-oriented MLP Structurescited by 160
- 2021Neural basis expansion analysis with exogenous variables: Forecasting electricity prices with NBEATSxcited by 64
- 2021Do We Really Need Deep Learning Models for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 45
- 2013Integrated Pre-Processing for Bayesian Nonlinear System Identification with Gaussian Processescited by 8
- 2016How Many Components should be Retained from a Multivariate Time Series PCA?cited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.