mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Assault Sentence Prediction in New Zealand

arXiv 2208.06981 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2022cs.LG cs.CL cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The judiciary has historically been conservative in its use of Artificial Intelligence, but recent advances in machine learning have prompted scholars to reconsider such use in tasks like sentence prediction. This paper investigates by experimentation the potential use of explainable artificial intelligence for predicting imprisonment sentences in assault cases in New Zealand's courts. We propose a proof-of-concept explainable model and verify in practice that it is fit for purpose, with predicted sentences accurate to within one year. We further analyse the model to understand the most influential phrases in sentence length prediction. We conclude the paper with an evaluative discussion of the future benefits and risks of different ways of using such an AI model in New Zealand's courts.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2022.

Builds on

3 of 33 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419

Built on by

Not cited yet.