Exploiting Neighborhood Interference with Low Order Interactions under Unit Randomized Design
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Network interference, where the outcome of an individual is affected by the treatment assignment of those in their social network, is pervasive in real-world settings. However, it poses a challenge to estimating causal effects. We consider the task of estimating the total treatment effect (TTE), or the difference between the average outcomes of the population when everyone is treated versus when no one is, under network interference. Under a Bernoulli randomized design, we provide an unbiased estimator for the TTE when network interference effects are constrained to low order interactions among neighbors of an individual. We make no assumptions on the graph other than bounded degree, allowing for well-connected networks that may not be easily clustered. We derive a bound on the variance of our estimator and show in simulated experiments that it performs well compared with standard estimators for the TTE. We also derive a minimax lower bound on the mean squared error of our estimator which suggests that the difficulty of estimation can be characterized by the degree of interactions in the potential outcomes model. We also prove that our estimator is asymptotically normal under boundedness conditions on the network degree and potential outcomes model. Central to our contribution is a new framework for balancing model flexibility and statistical complexity as captured by this low order interactions structure.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023Individualized Policy Evaluation and Learning under Clustered Network Interferencecited by 6
- 2025Choosing the Better Bandit Algorithm under Data Sharing: When Do A/B Experiments Work?cited by 4
- 2023A Two-Part Machine Learning Approach to Characterizing Network Interference in A/B Testingcited by 3
- 2022Network Synthetic Interventions: A Causal Framework for Panel Data Under Network Interferencecited by 2
- 2025Differences-in-Neighbors for Network Interference in Experimentscited by 1
- 2026CausalSmith: A Formally Grounded, Self-Improving Agentic Framework for Automated Research in Causal Inferencecited by 1
- 2026Causal Effects with Unobserved Unit Types in Interacting Human-AI Systemscited by 0
- 2026CausalSmith: A Formally Grounded, Self-Improving Agentic Framework for Automated Research in Causal Inference24 Jul 2026
- 2026Causal Effects with Unobserved Unit Types in Interacting Human-AI Systems2 Mar 2026
- 2025Choosing the Better Bandit Algorithm under Data Sharing: When Do A/B Experiments Work?16 Jul 2025
- 2025Differences-in-Neighbors for Network Interference in Experiments4 Mar 2025
- 2023Individualized Policy Evaluation and Learning under Clustered Network Interference4 Nov 2023
- 2023A Two-Part Machine Learning Approach to Characterizing Network Interference in A/B Testing18 Aug 2023
- 2022Network Synthetic Interventions: A Causal Framework for Panel Data Under Network Interference20 Oct 2022