mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Where's the Learning in Representation Learning for Compositional Semantics and the Case of Thematic Fit

arXiv 2208.04749 ↗First posted 9 Aug 2022cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Observing that for certain NLP tasks, such as semantic role prediction or thematic fit estimation, random embeddings perform as well as pretrained embeddings, we explore what settings allow for this and examine where most of the learning is encoded: the word embeddings, the semantic role embeddings, or ``the network''. We find nuanced answers, depending on the task and its relation to the training objective. We examine these representation learning aspects in multi-task learning, where role prediction and role-filling are supervised tasks, while several thematic fit tasks are outside the models' direct supervision. We observe a non-monotonous relation between some tasks' quality score and the training data size. In order to better understand this observation, we analyze these results using easier, per-verb versions of these tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2022.

Builds on

4 of 25 references.

References · 4

  1. 2018Jointly Predicting Predicates and Arguments in Neural Semantic Role Labelingcited by 34
  2. 2021A comparative evaluation and analysis of three generations of Distributional Semantic Modelscited by 19
  3. 2022What do Toothbrushes do in the Kitchen? How Transformers Think our World is Structuredcited by 5
  4. 2021Thematic Fit Bits: Annotation Quality and Quantity Interplay for Event Participant Representationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.