Comparison of semi-supervised learning methods for High Content Screening quality control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Progress in automated microscopy and quantitative image analysis has promoted high-content screening (HCS) as an efficient drug discovery and research tool. While HCS offers to quantify complex cellular phenotypes from images at high throughput, this process can be obstructed by image aberrations such as out-of-focus image blur, fluorophore saturation, debris, a high level of noise, unexpected auto-fluorescence or empty images. While this issue has received moderate attention in the literature, overlooking these artefacts can seriously hamper downstream image processing tasks and hinder detection of subtle phenotypes. It is therefore of primary concern, and a prerequisite, to use quality control in HCS. In this work, we evaluate deep learning options that do not require extensive image annotations to provide a straightforward and easy to use semi-supervised learning solution to this issue. Concretely, we compared the efficacy of recent self-supervised and transfer learning approaches to provide a base encoder to a high throughput artefact image detector. The results of this study suggest that transfer learning methods should be preferred for this task as they not only performed best here but present the advantage of not requiring sensitive hyperparameter settings nor extensive additional training.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2022.
Builds on
13 of 24 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
- 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
- 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 554
- 2020SCAN: Learning to Classify Images without Labelscited by 352
- 2021Solo-learn: A Library of Self-supervised Methods for Visual Representation Learningcited by 116
- 2020Transfer Learning or Self-supervised Learning? A Tale of Two Pretraining Paradigmscited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.