mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust Training and Verification of Implicit Neural Networks: A Non-Euclidean Contractive Approach

arXiv 2208.03889 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2022cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper proposes a theoretical and computational framework for training and robustness verification of implicit neural networks based upon non-Euclidean contraction theory. The basic idea is to cast the robustness analysis of a neural network as a reachability problem and use (i) the ℓ∞-norm input-output Lipschitz constant and (ii) the tight inclusion function of the network to over-approximate its reachable sets. First, for a given implicit neural network, we use ℓ∞-matrix measures to propose sufficient conditions for its well-posedness, design an iterative algorithm to compute its fixed points, and provide upper bounds for its ℓ_∞-norm input-output Lipschitz constant. Second, we introduce a related embedded network and show that the embedded network can be used to provide an ℓ_∞-norm box over-approximation of the reachable sets of the original network. Moreover, we use the embedded network to design an iterative algorithm for computing the upper bounds of the original system's tight inclusion function. Third, we use the upper bounds of the Lipschitz constants and the upper bounds of the tight inclusion functions to design two algorithms for the training and robustness verification of implicit neural networks. Finally, we apply our algorithms to train implicit neural networks on the MNIST dataset and compare the robustness of our models with the models trained via existing approaches in the literature.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2022.

Builds on

23 of 31 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  5. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
  6. 2019Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 615
  7. 2017OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networkscited by 599
  8. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
  9. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
  10. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
  11. 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 415
  12. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 328
11 more
  1. 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
  2. 2019Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 205
  3. 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 180
  4. 2019Implicit Deep Learningcited by 124
  5. 2020Monotone operator equilibrium networkscited by 100
  6. 2019Lipschitz Certificates for Layered Network Structures Driven by Averaged Activation Operatorscited by 55
  7. 2020Lipschitz Bounded Equilibrium Networkscited by 49
  8. 2021Robust Implicit Networks via Non-Euclidean Contractionscited by 20
  9. 2021Semialgebraic Representation of Monotone Deep Equilibrium Models and Applications to Certificationcited by 16
  10. 2021Robustness Certificates for Implicit Neural Networks: A Mixed Monotone Contractive Approachcited by 8
  11. 2022Comparative Analysis of Interval Reachability for Robust Implicit and Feedforward Neural Networkscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.