Unifying physical systems' inductive biases in neural ODE using dynamics constraints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conservation of energy is at the core of many physical phenomena and dynamical systems. There have been a significant number of works in the past few years aimed at predicting the trajectory of motion of dynamical systems using neural networks while adhering to the law of conservation of energy. Most of these works are inspired by classical mechanics such as Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics as well as Neural Ordinary Differential Equations. While these works have been shown to work well in specific domains respectively, there is a lack of a unifying method that is more generally applicable without requiring significant changes to the neural network architectures. In this work, we aim to address this issue by providing a simple method that could be applied to not just energy-conserving systems, but also dissipative systems, by including a different inductive bias in different cases in the form of a regularisation term in the loss function. The proposed method does not require changing the neural network architecture and could form the basis to validate a novel idea, therefore showing promises to accelerate research in this direction.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2022.
Builds on
19 of 34 references.
References · 19
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
- 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
- 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
- 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 388
- 2019Symplectic Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 148
- 2019Hamiltonian Generative Networkscited by 136
- 2019Hamiltonian Graph Networks with ODE Integratorscited by 107
- 2020Simplifying Hamiltonian and Lagrangian Neural Networks via Explicit Constraintscited by 102
7 more
- 2020Dissipative SymODEN: Encoding Hamiltonian Dynamics with Dissipation and Control into Deep Learningcited by 77
- 2022Dissipative Hamiltonian Neural Networks: Learning Dissipative and Conservative Dynamics Separatelycited by 46
- 2020Learning Poisson systems and trajectories of autonomous systems via Poisson neural networkscited by 37
- 2022Deconstructing the Inductive Biases of Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 31
- 2020Constrained Neural Ordinary Differential Equations with Stability Guaranteescited by 13
- 2021KAM Theory Meets Statistical Learning Theory: Hamiltonian Neural Networks with Non-Zero Training Losscited by 2
- 2021Learning ODEs via Diffeomorphisms for Fast and Robust Integrationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Stabilized Neural Differential Equations for Learning Dynamics with Explicit Constraintscited by 15
- 2024When are dynamical systems learned from time series data statistically accurate?cited by 14
- 2025Semi-Explicit Neural DAEs: Learning Long-Horizon Dynamical Systems with Algebraic Constraintscited by 4
- 2024A Two-Stage Training Method for Modeling Constrained Systems With Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Dynamical and Optimization Trade-offs of Levi--Civita Coordinates for Learned Close-Encounter Dynamicscited by 0
- 2026Dynamical and Optimization Trade-offs of Levi--Civita Coordinates for Learned Close-Encounter Dynamics22 Jul 2026
- 2025Semi-Explicit Neural DAEs: Learning Long-Horizon Dynamical Systems with Algebraic Constraints26 May 2025
- 2024When are dynamical systems learned from time series data statistically accurate?9 Nov 2024
- 2024A Two-Stage Training Method for Modeling Constrained Systems With Neural Networks5 Mar 2024
- 2023Stabilized Neural Differential Equations for Learning Dynamics with Explicit Constraints16 Jun 2023